Renal Denervation, 24-Month Evolution

Hypertension is a very common condition, and generally manageable. However, as we know, it is associated to cardiovascular events. 

Even though the therapeutic arsenal enables us with drugs and drug combinations, in many occasions adequate control will elude us, or three or more drugs will be required. 

Renal denervation (RDN) has been shown effective to reduce hypertension in different studies, although important questions remain unanswered, such as efficacy over time and whether it offers benefits vs. conventional treatment. 

The SPYRAL HTN-ON MED was analyzed (a randomized controlled trial) including 337 hypertensive patients treated with 1 to 3 drugs with elusive results, defined as office systolic blood pressure (BP) >150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg and diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg, or 24 hour ambulatory systolic BP >140 mmHg and≤170 mmHg. 206 of these patients received RDN.

Read also: Intravascular Lithotripsy vs. Rotational Atherectomy for Calcified Coronary Lesions.

The groups were comparable: on average, antihypertensive medication was 1.8 among RDN patients and 1.7 in the control group (CG); mean patient age was 55; 80 % were men; their history included heart disease in 6 % and stroke or TIA in 1 %; conserved kidney function. Baseline Office BP was 163/101 mmHg and ambulatory BP 149/96 mmHg.

At 6 months, crossover was allowed and 66 patients received RDN.

At 24 months, patients receiving RDN presented significantly reduced systolic BP in ambulatory BP (−12.1±15.3 mmHg [n=176] vs. −7.0±13.1 mmHg [n=33]; difference: −5.7 mmHg; P=0.039) and office BP groups (−17.4±16.1 mmHg [n=187] vs. −9.0±19.4 mmHg [n=35]; difference: −8.7 mmHg; P=0.0034) vs. the control group. Also, the increase in number of antihypertensives was greater in the control group vs RDN patients (1.7–2.7 vs. 1.8–2.8; P=0.046).

Read also: Is it Time to Give Up Aspirin after PCI in High Bleeding Risk Patients? A Critical Analysis of STOPDAPT-3.

Crossover patients also saw significantly reduced systolic BR vs. those who had received RDN from the start.

No patient presented severe renal stenosis at 24 months after RDN.

Conclusion

Renal denervation lead to a significant reduction of systolic BP, both in office and at 24-hour ambulatory monitoring vs. the control group, despite the latter used more antihypertensives. 

Hipertensión/denervasión renal

Original Title: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation: 24-Month Results From the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Trial.

Reference: David E. Kandzar, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025;18:e015194. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015194.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...