A New Score to Predict Post TAVI Mortality

 

TAVI new score

Few studies have evaluated the impact of new comorbidities, fragility and disability indices on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) outcomes.

This study analyzes Medtronic CoreValve U.S. Pivotal patients to develop a new, simpler scoring system to use in addition to the standard assessment of TAVI patients.

A multidisciplinary heart team used objective criteria, the STS PROM (The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality) and subjective criteria, fragility, to assess eligibility for TAVI.

The analyzis included 3,687 patients randomized 2:1 into a derivation cohort (n=2482) and a validation cohort (n=1205). The study assessed predictors of all-cause mortality, used to calculate a risk score for each patient.

Overall mortality at 30 days was 5.8%, and 22.8% at one year.

Predictors of mortality at 1 year were:

  • excessive use of home oxygen
  • assisted living
  • albumin levels <3.3 g/dl
  • falls in the past 6 months
  • STS PROM >7%.
  • Charlson comorbidity score ≥5.

 

A simple scoring system based on these predictors could effectively stratify risk at 30 days and one year into low, moderate and high risk.

This score showed a 3 fold difference in mortality rate at 30 days in the low and high risk groups:

Low Risk: 3.6%

High Risk: 10.9%

And a similar difference at one year:

 

Low Risk: 12.3%

High Risk: 36.6%

The prediction model at one year was more stable and accurate than the one at 30 days.

 

Conclusion

A simple score based on new predictors effectively stratified mortality risk at short and long term in TAVI patients.

 

Original Title: Predicting Early and Late Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Reference: Hermiller JB Jr et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jul 26;68(4):343-52.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or suggestions here below.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...