ESC 2018 | ASCEND: Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Diabetic Patients Fails the Cost-Benefit Analysis

The obvious risk of bleeding posed by aspirin was too clear in this work, casting a shadow of doubt over the indication of aspirin for primary prevention in diabetic patients.

ASCEND: Aspirina para prevención primaria en diabéticos no pasa el costo/beneficioAccording to the ASCEND trial, presented at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2018 Congress and simultaneously published in NEJM, aspirin reduces cardiovascular events as primary prevention, but the cost in terms of major bleeding is too high to support its use in this setting.

 

Over a 7.4-year follow-up, aspirin reduced major cardiovascular events, from 9.6% in placebo-treated patients to 8.5% in aspirin-treated patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.97). However, aspirin treatment raised the risk of major bleeding from 3.2% in placebo-treated patients to 4.1% in aspirin-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.09-1.52).


Read also: ESC 2018 | MARINER: Rivaroxaban as Thromboprophylaxis after Hospitalization.


There was no patient subgroup in which the benefits clearly outweighed the risks. Furthermore, aspirin did not reduce the occurrence of any type of cancer during the follow-up period, contrary to what had been observed in the earliest (and oldest) studies with this drug.

 

Most of the 15,480 patients included in the trial had their other risk factors well managed, with high rates of statin and antihypertensive use, good glycemic control, and a low rate of smoking. All of this may have been key as regards the difference with early works.

 

The results of this work will surely have an impact on both sides of the Atlantic, since the 2015 American guidelines (from the American Heart Association [AHA] and the American Diabetes Association) recommend aspirin as a reasonable treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes (unless contraindicated).


Read also: ESC 2018 | FRANCE-TAVI: Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation Associated to Mortality in TAVR.


In contrast, the 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention contain a class III recommendation against the use of antiplatelet therapy (including aspirin) in patients with diabetes and no history of cardiovascular disease.

 

The ASCEND trial had a 2×2 factorial design and included patients 40 and older with diabetes and no evidence of cardiovascular disease at baseline. Patients were randomized to enteric-coated aspirin 100 mg daily vs. placebo and to supplementation with 1-g capsules of omega 3 or placebo.

 

Original title: Effects of Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus.

Reference: Presented by Jane Armitage at the European Society of Cardiology 2018 Congress and simultaneously published in N Engl J Med. 2018;Epub ahead of print.

 

ASCEND


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...