ESC 2018 | ASCEND: Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Diabetic Patients Fails the Cost-Benefit Analysis

The obvious risk of bleeding posed by aspirin was too clear in this work, casting a shadow of doubt over the indication of aspirin for primary prevention in diabetic patients.

ASCEND: Aspirina para prevención primaria en diabéticos no pasa el costo/beneficioAccording to the ASCEND trial, presented at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2018 Congress and simultaneously published in NEJM, aspirin reduces cardiovascular events as primary prevention, but the cost in terms of major bleeding is too high to support its use in this setting.

 

Over a 7.4-year follow-up, aspirin reduced major cardiovascular events, from 9.6% in placebo-treated patients to 8.5% in aspirin-treated patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.97). However, aspirin treatment raised the risk of major bleeding from 3.2% in placebo-treated patients to 4.1% in aspirin-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.09-1.52).


Read also: ESC 2018 | MARINER: Rivaroxaban as Thromboprophylaxis after Hospitalization.


There was no patient subgroup in which the benefits clearly outweighed the risks. Furthermore, aspirin did not reduce the occurrence of any type of cancer during the follow-up period, contrary to what had been observed in the earliest (and oldest) studies with this drug.

 

Most of the 15,480 patients included in the trial had their other risk factors well managed, with high rates of statin and antihypertensive use, good glycemic control, and a low rate of smoking. All of this may have been key as regards the difference with early works.

 

The results of this work will surely have an impact on both sides of the Atlantic, since the 2015 American guidelines (from the American Heart Association [AHA] and the American Diabetes Association) recommend aspirin as a reasonable treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes (unless contraindicated).


Read also: ESC 2018 | FRANCE-TAVI: Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation Associated to Mortality in TAVR.


In contrast, the 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention contain a class III recommendation against the use of antiplatelet therapy (including aspirin) in patients with diabetes and no history of cardiovascular disease.

 

The ASCEND trial had a 2×2 factorial design and included patients 40 and older with diabetes and no evidence of cardiovascular disease at baseline. Patients were randomized to enteric-coated aspirin 100 mg daily vs. placebo and to supplementation with 1-g capsules of omega 3 or placebo.

 

Original title: Effects of Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus.

Reference: Presented by Jane Armitage at the European Society of Cardiology 2018 Congress and simultaneously published in N Engl J Med. 2018;Epub ahead of print.

 

ASCEND


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

ACC 2026 | FAST III: vFFR vs FFR in physiology-guided revascularization of intermediate coronary lesions

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions remains a cornerstone in decision-making for coronary revascularization. Although FFR continues to be one of the guideline-recommended references,...