AHA 2018 | Endocarditis Prophylaxis More Limited after AHA 2007 Guidelines

The incidence of infective endocarditis had decreased after AHA 2007 recommendations. At present, some patients are not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis as they should.

Disminuye la profilaxis de endocarditis luego de las guías del 2007After AHA restricted the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in 2007, high-risk patients undergoing dental procedures were prescribed less antibiotics. These patients had always been prescribed antibiotic prophylaxis, regardless they had less restrictive guidelines.  

 

At the same time, we observe a surprising trend towards lower incidence of infections endocarditis, which calls our attention. All these cases were presented at AHA annual meeting in 2018, and simultaneously published in JACC.


Read also: AHA 2018 | Freedom Long-Term Follow-up: Still in Favor of CABG.


In moderate risk patients, there was a more appropriate reduction of antibiotic prophylaxis after the new recommendations, with a more modest reduction in endocarditis rate for this group.

 

Even though this is an observational study, and we are no table to establish a cause-effect relationship between prescription frequency and endocarditis incidence, these finding support guideline recommendations.

 

However, we should not drop our guard: all high-risk patients undergoing dental procedures should receive antibiotic prophylaxis (not those at moderate risk).

 

Researchers estimate antibiotic prophylaxis has fallen across all groups since 2007 AHA recommendations. The drop has affected 52% of low or unknown risk patients, 64% of patients at moderate risk and 20% of high-risk patients.

 

Original title: Antibiotic prophylaxis and incidence of endocarditis before and after the 2007 AHA recommendations.

Reference: Thornhill et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2543-2554.

 

profilaxis-antibiótica


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....