Errata sheet regarding the publication “The Impella device questioned in the post-approval studies due to an increase of adverse events”

What was published in our website refers to the original publication by the FDA (Increased rate of mortality in patients receiving Abiomed Impella RP System – letter to health care providers) where, inadvertently, it was excluded from the title that the FDA communication referred exclusively to the Impella RP device.

The Impella circulatory assistance system comprises 4 different devices:

. Impella CP (the only model approved to be used in a LATAM country as Brazil).

. Impella 2.5 and Impella 5.0: for left ventricular assistance.

. Impella RP: for right ventricular assistance. It is this device in particular that the aforementioned published article refers to. This article is nothing but a summary of the FDA communication.

The lack of specification of the acronym RP in the title, referring to this particular model, could lead doctors reading only the title of the article to generalize these results to the rest of devices. This would, without a doubt, jeopardize left assistance models that have proven their benefits in the context of complex angioplasties and cardiogenic shock. By reading the full text of the article it is clear to which model it is referring to, but this is not so in the title, reason for which we believe it’s convenient to publish the present errata sheet.

Soon, we will publish a recent analysis of over 15,000 patients in the US that have benefitted from left assistance.

More articles by this author

Shortened DAPT Regimens According to the PRECISE-HBR Score

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention depends on balancing the prevention of ischemic events against the risk of...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Shortened DAPT Regimens According to the PRECISE-HBR Score

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention depends on balancing the prevention of ischemic events against the risk of...

SAFE-PROTECT at 12 Months: AnchorMan vs. Watchman for Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an alternative therapeutic strategy for reducing the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Randomized...

Clinical and haemodynamic outcomes with contemporary intra- vs. supra-annular valves: The HERA-TAVI Registry

According to the latest European guidelines, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the recommended treatment for patients aged ≥70 years with symptomatic severe aortic...