Next-Day Discharge after TAVR: Equally Safe for All Prosthesis?

Yet scarce, there is evidence supporting next-day discharge (NDD) after TAVR is safe when patients receiving balloon expandable valves meet certain conditions. This had not yet been shown for self-expandable valves. This study looks into NDD after TAVR by femoral access with self-expandable valves. 

El alta en el mismo día luego de una angioplastia coronaria es cada vez más popular pero todavía no es regla

The authors retrospectively compared all consecutive patients undergoing elective minimalist TAVR between January 2017 and July 2018. They looked at next-day discharge success rate and the factors that prevent this from happening.

In addition, results were compared at 90 days and one year after next-day discharge with self-expandable ACURATE neo and balloon expandable SAPIEN 3.


Read also: The Most Read Articles in Interventional Cardiology in SOLACI.


During this period, 315 valves were implanted, 146 patients received the ACURATE neo and 103 received the SAPIEN 3.

60% of ACURATE neo patients (n=87) and 55% of the SAPIEN 3 patients (n=57) were discharged the next day after TAVR, which makes no significant difference.

Predictors preventing NDD after TAVR were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 0.49) and baseline anemia (OR 0.98), but not valve type.


Read also: Functional Assessment of Lesions: Advances with MRI.


After excluding cases with more hospitalization days, there were no differences at 90 days in mortality (0% vs 0%) or new pacemaker implantation (1% vs 0%); p=0.40) between both devices. Something similar was observed with mortality at one year (8% vs 10%; p>0.8).

Conclusion

Safety of NDD using the self-expandable ACURATE neo was similar to NDD with SAPIEN 3, with comparable results at 90 days and one year.

Original Title: Safety of Next-Day Discharge After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Self-Expandable Versus Balloon-Expandable Valve Prosthesis.

Reference: Moriyama N et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun;12(6):e007756.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...

TAVR in Young Low-Risk Patients

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has established itself as an effective strategy for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis across different risk groups. While previous...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...