Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Next-Day Discharge after TAVR: Is It Viable?

Next-day discharge after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) might be viable, with no major complications at 30 days or one year, compared against patients with longer hospital stay. We only have to consider a few factors that will help us choose the most adequate patients for this modality without compromising safety.

Es viable el alta al otro día en pacientes que reciben TAVIOne of the main advantages of TAVR is a faster recovery post procedure, compared to patients undergoing conventional surgery. Our passionate inquisitive nature imposed the minimalist approach with conscious sedation, local anesthesia, transthoracic ECG and femoral access site. All of this made us dream with early discharge, but next day discharged seemed too far-fetched, even for the most optimistic.

 

The study included 663 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR with balloon-expandable valve in one center. The aim was to determine predictors of next day discharge in patients receiving minimalist transfemoral TAVR, in addition to comparing 30 day and one year outcomes against patients with longer hospital stay, after excluding all cases with complications. Primary end point was a composite of mortality and readmission at 1 year.

 

A total of 150 patients were discharged the next day of procedure and 210 remained hospitalized. Population mean age was 80.7 ± 8.8 years and mean STS was 6.6 ± 3.7%.


Read also: Transradial Access and Early Discharge in Percutaneous Interventions.


Predictors of next day discharge were male sex (OR 2.02), absence of atrial fibrillation (OR 1.62), serum creatinine (OR 0.71), and age (OR 0.95).

 

As expected, 84% of patients with complications remained hospitalized. After excluding patients with complications, there were no differences at 30 days between next day discharge patients and those that stayed longer. However, at one year follow up the combined end point was significantly lower in the next day discharge group (HR 0.47). This difference can be due to the lower risk of non-cardiovascular related readmission in the next day discharge group.

 

Conclusion

Among uncomplicated patients undergoing TAVR, there was a similar events rate at 30 days between patients discharged the next day after procedure and patients that stayed longer. At one year, events rate was significantly lower for those with early discharge.

 

Original title: Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Next-Day Discharge After Minimalist Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Reference: Norihiko Kamioka et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2018;11:107–15.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Implantation Depth Could Determine Thrombosis Risk

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has undergone significant advances over the past two decades. This progress has been driven by the development of new...

Influence of cusp-overlap and three-cusp coplanar techniques on new-onset conduction disturbances after TAVI

New-onset conduction disturbances remain one of the most frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), being associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes. Among...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Implantation Depth Could Determine Thrombosis Risk

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has undergone significant advances over the past two decades. This progress has been driven by the development of new...

Influence of cusp-overlap and three-cusp coplanar techniques on new-onset conduction disturbances after TAVI

New-onset conduction disturbances remain one of the most frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), being associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes. Among...

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...