ESC 2019 | SYNTAXES: Ten-Year Outcomes!

The SYNTAXES (SYNTAX Extended Survival) was presented at ESC 2019 with somewhat unexpected results in favor of PCI. This is why the SYNTAX continues to be one of the best studies interventional cardiologists can rely on.

The original SYNTAX tested mortality (primary end point) with PCI vs. CABG in patients with multivessel and/or left main disease. After the SYNTAX, several randomized studies have followed suit, using more modern stents, intravascular imaging and coronary physiology to decide for or against PCI.

There has been a debate about long-term outcomes, seeing as, in theory, CABG would have greater benefits. The SYNTAXES is the first large randomized study to provide us with unique ten- year outcomes for PCI (at least in terms of mortality). It is worth noting that a remarkable 94% of the population was able to complete follow up.


Read also: ESC 2019 | PARAGON-HF: Sacubitril/Valsartan Somewhat Disappointing, though a Few Would Benefit.


Results showed the equivalence in primary end point (all-cause mortality) between PCI and CABG (27% PCI and 23.5% CABG; p=0.092). There were no differences in patients with left main disease (26.1% PCI and 26.7% CABG; p=0.47) or diabetis (34.2% PCI and 32.1% CABG, p=0.56).

However, there was a difference in survival in favor of CABG in patients with three-vessel disease (27.7% PCI and 20.6% CABG, p=0.006). This difference was driven by patients with SYNTAX score >33. It does not come as a surprise and, for years now, we have known the SYNTAX >33 are not for interventional cardiologists, unless there is CABG counterindication.

These outcomes provide us with the foundation to further PCI, especially in the treatment of diabetics (despite the FREEDOM), and patients with left main disease and three-vessel disease with low or intermediate SYNTAX score.

All this in the context of a stent that has been discontinued and that has clearly been surpassed by the new generation devices (even though we seem to have reached a plateau). Furthermore, there are now more potent antiplatelet agents, coronary physiology to make better informed decisions and intravascular imaging to optimize outcomes.

Original title: Ten-year survival after coronary artery bypass grafting vs PCI: the SYNTAX Extended Survival study.

Reference: Presentado por Daniel Johannes en el ESC 2019. Paris, Francia.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...