ESC 2019 | SYNTAXES: Ten-Year Outcomes!

The SYNTAXES (SYNTAX Extended Survival) was presented at ESC 2019 with somewhat unexpected results in favor of PCI. This is why the SYNTAX continues to be one of the best studies interventional cardiologists can rely on.

The original SYNTAX tested mortality (primary end point) with PCI vs. CABG in patients with multivessel and/or left main disease. After the SYNTAX, several randomized studies have followed suit, using more modern stents, intravascular imaging and coronary physiology to decide for or against PCI.

There has been a debate about long-term outcomes, seeing as, in theory, CABG would have greater benefits. The SYNTAXES is the first large randomized study to provide us with unique ten- year outcomes for PCI (at least in terms of mortality). It is worth noting that a remarkable 94% of the population was able to complete follow up.


Read also: ESC 2019 | PARAGON-HF: Sacubitril/Valsartan Somewhat Disappointing, though a Few Would Benefit.


Results showed the equivalence in primary end point (all-cause mortality) between PCI and CABG (27% PCI and 23.5% CABG; p=0.092). There were no differences in patients with left main disease (26.1% PCI and 26.7% CABG; p=0.47) or diabetis (34.2% PCI and 32.1% CABG, p=0.56).

However, there was a difference in survival in favor of CABG in patients with three-vessel disease (27.7% PCI and 20.6% CABG, p=0.006). This difference was driven by patients with SYNTAX score >33. It does not come as a surprise and, for years now, we have known the SYNTAX >33 are not for interventional cardiologists, unless there is CABG counterindication.

These outcomes provide us with the foundation to further PCI, especially in the treatment of diabetics (despite the FREEDOM), and patients with left main disease and three-vessel disease with low or intermediate SYNTAX score.

All this in the context of a stent that has been discontinued and that has clearly been surpassed by the new generation devices (even though we seem to have reached a plateau). Furthermore, there are now more potent antiplatelet agents, coronary physiology to make better informed decisions and intravascular imaging to optimize outcomes.

Original title: Ten-year survival after coronary artery bypass grafting vs PCI: the SYNTAX Extended Survival study.

Reference: Presentado por Daniel Johannes en el ESC 2019. Paris, Francia.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...