Virtual ACC 2020 | POPULAR TAVR: Post TAVR Anticoagulation without Clopidogrel?

In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) that also required anticoagulation for another indication (mostly atrial fibrillation), the incidence of major bleeding between month 1 and 12 was lower in those receiving only anticoagulation instead of anticoagulation + clopidogrel. 

ACC 2020 Virtual | POPULAR TAVI: ¿anticoagulación sin clopidogrel post TAVI?

The present study presented as part of the scientific sessions at the virtual ACC 2020, simultaneously published in NEJM included TAVR patients with prior anticoagulation adequately indicated. Patients were randomized 1:1 to no clopidogrel (only anticoagulation) vs clopidogrel and anticoagulation for 3 months.

Primary end points were all bleedings not related to the procedure at 12 months. Secondary end points were a combination of cardiovascular death, bleeding not related to the procedure, stroke and MI.

Bleeding events occurred in 21.7% (34 of 157) of those receiving only anticoagulation vs 34.6% (54 of 156) of those receiving anticoagulation plus clopidogrel (RR 0.63; IC 95% 0.43 to 0.90; p=0.01). Most bleeding events were at the access site.


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | Controversial Trial ISCHEMIA Finally in NEJM.


Bleeding events not related to the procedure occurred in 21.7% vs 34%, respectively (RR 0.64; CI 95% 0.44 to 0.92; p=0.02). Most bleeding events occurred in the first month and were minor. 

Conclusion

In TAVR patients with prior anticoagulation indication a strategy with no antiplatelet antiaggregation (clopidogrel) and only anticoagulation resulted safer.

populartavi

Original Title: Anticoagulation with or without Clopidogrel after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation.

Reference: V.J. Nijenhuis et al. NEJM 2020, article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....