Effects of Health Promotion Since Childhood

All clinical practice guidelines indicate healthy lifestyle recommendations and, as cardiologists, we have slowly but surely implemented such practice.

promoción de los hábitos saludables desde la niñez

However, patients come to us once they have had health problems. What would happen if people had these recommendations at an earlier stage in their life? Would that prevent them from ever becoming patients?

There was some logic to that idea, but it had to be tested in the long term to see if the lifestyle change provoked was sustained over time and if new interventions were necessary.

That is why this study tested the long-term impact of health promotion on preschool children in an urban low-income area of Colombia (phase 1). Additionally, researchers assessed the effects of a new community intervention (phase 2).


Read also: ACC 2019 | The New ACC/AHA Guidelines on Primary Prevention Focus on Life Style, Diet and Socioeconomic Factors.


In phase 1, researchers conducted an analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and habits toward a healthy lifestyle, and ideal cardiovascular health scores in 1216 children. Among them, 596 had previously received health promotion recommendations at 3 to 5 years old. The remaining 620 subjects had not taken part in any prior intervention.

In phase 2, all children were randomized 1:1 to undergo either an additional 4-month educational intervention (the SI! Program) or no other intervention (the control group).

The primary endpoint were the changes from baseline in healthy lifestyle and ideal cardiovascular health scores.


Read also: Maintaining Physical Activity After an Acute Myocardial Infarction Reduces Mortality.


In phase 1, about 85% of children did not have a healthy lifestyle. Those who had previously taken part in a preschool intervention at 3 to 5 years old showed a practically negligible residual effect compared with those who took part in an intervention at 9 to 13 years old.

In phase 2, there was no difference between the 4-month intervention group and the control group.

All of that notwithstanding, there was a dose-response effect. The maximal benefit was observed in children who attended >75% of the scheduled intervention program.


Read also: The Crucial Significance of Lifestyle Changes.


The difference in healthy lifestyle changes between the high- and low-adherence groups was 3.72 points (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

While there were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups, high adherence rates to health promotion interventions might improve future cardiovascular health.

New interventions may be required at multiple stages to induce sustained health promotion effects.

Original Title: Sustainability of and Adherence to Preschool Health Promotion Among Children 9 to 13 Years Old.

Reference: Rodrigo Fernández-Jiménez et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:1565–78.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...