IN.PACT AV ACCESS | Drug-Coated Balloons for Dialysis Fistulas

The IN.PACT AV Access study, recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), showed that drug-coated balloons are superior for the treatment of stenotic lesions in arteriovenous fistulas for dialysis compared with conventional balloons.

Balones farmacológicos en fístulas para diálisis

Dialysis fistulas are an unknown territory for paclitaxel-eluting balloons, since the formal recommendation in the guidelines is conventional angioplasty (which, by the way, has rather poor outcomes).

The IN.PACT AV Access was a prospective, single-blinde trial including 330 patients at 29 international sites.

Patients with new or restenotic lesions in native upper-limb arteriovenous fistulas were eligible for participation. After successful angioplasty with high-pressure balloons, participants were randomly assigned to receive treatment with a drug-coated balloon or a standard balloon.

The primary endpoint was lesion patency, defined as freedom from new revascularization or access-circuit thrombosis within 6 months from the index procedure.


Read also: 2 Year Outcomes of Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon in Superficial Femoral Arteries.


After a 6-month follow-up, patency in participants who had been treated with a drug-coated balloon was 82.2% vs. 59.5% for those treated with conventional angioplasty (p < 0.001). Drug-coated balloons were non-inferior as regards the safety endpoint.

Conclusion

Drug-coated balloons are superior to standard angioplasty for the treatment of stenotic lesions in dysfunctional hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas.

Original Title: Drug-Coated Balloons for Dysfunctional Dialysis Arteriovenous Fistulas.

Reference: Robert A. Lookstein et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383:733-42. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914617.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...