AHA 2020 | AFFIRM-AHF: Ferric Carboxymaltose and Fewer Hospitalizations for Cardiac Failure

Correcting iron deficiency in patients with cardiac failure might reduce the risk of new hospitalizations according to the AFFIRM-AHF published in the Lancet and presented at AHA 2020.

The combined primary end point of death and hospitalizations was not met; yet the study showed a significant reduction of 26% in hospitalization rate.

Irrespective of the presence of anemia, iron deficiency is among the predictors of bad prognosis and is present in over 70% of patients with cardiac failure.

This new study data support the administration of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose for patients with iron deficiency (with or without anemia) and less than 50% ejection fraction. Therefore, rather than a bad prognosis factor, iron deficiency has become a changeable factor. 

AFFIRM-AHF was a multicenter study including 1108 patients hospitalized for cardiac failure. They all had iron deficiency defined as ferritin <100 μg/L, or 100–299 μg/L with transferrin saturation <20%). Mean age was 71 and mean ejection fraction was 33%. Before discharge, patients were randomized to endovenous iron vs. placebo. 


Read also: AHA 2020 | Statins: Confirmed Benefits for the Elderly.


At 52 weeks followup, cardiovascular events rate resulted similar between the branches, as was the combined end point of death and hospitalization. However, when looked at separately, new hospitalization rate saw a significant reduction of 26%.

hierro-en-ICC

Original Title: Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency at discharge after acute heart failure: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

Reference: Ponikowski P et al. Lancet. 2020; Epub ahead of print y presentado en las sesiones científicas del AHA 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....