Sapien 3 Performs Well in “Jobs” for Which It Is Not Designed

Using Sapien 3, transcatheter mitral valve replacement to treat failed bioprosthetic valves can be performed with a high degree of technical success.

Buen desempeño de la Sapien 3 en “trabajos” para los que no está diseñada

Failed mitral bioprosthetic valves are truly challenging due to how frequent symptoms are and the high morbidity/mortality associated with a new surgical replacement. Furthermore, there are no catheter options specifically designed to treat this issue.

Sapien 3 was developed as a last resource, but thanks to its good results, it is becoming a consistently good option.

Researchers analyzed prospectively all patients implanted with Sapien 3 to treat a failed mitral prosthesis between 2015 and 2019 included in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) registry. The primary efficacy endpoint was 1-year mortality, and secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, New York Heart Association functional class, and valve performance.


Read also: Convalescent Plasma for Severe Pneumonia from COVID-19.


A total of 1529 patients were included; they had undergone a mitral valve-in-valve procedure through transseptal or transapical access in 295 sites. Technical success was achieved in 96.8% of patients and 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 5.4% and 16.7%, respectively.

Transseptal access was linked to lower 1-year mortality compared with transapical access (15.8% vs. 21.7%; p = 0.03). 

New valve implantation provided immediate and sustained symptomatic relief. Baseline New York Heart Association functional class was III/IV in 87.1% of patients vs. 9.7% after a year.

Conclusion

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement in failed mitral bioprosthetic valves was associated with high technical success, lower 30-day/1-year mortality rates, and significant improvement of heart failure symptoms.

This option should be considered for most patients with failed mitral bioprosthetic valve and favorable anatomy.

Original Title: One-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Using the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve.

Reference: Brian Whisenan et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(11):1245-1252. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2974.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...