Should We Discontinue Anticoagulation Before TAVR?

Against what common sense dictates, continuing oral anticoagulation pre- and post- transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is safe, according to this article soon to be published in JACC Interventions. There was no increase in hemorrhagic or vascular complications and, paradoxically, those who continued using anticoagulant agents received fewer transfusions that those who did not.

¿Es necesario suspender la anticoagulación previa al TAVI?

A significant portion of patients who undergo TAVR have a prior indication for long-term oral anticoagulation. However, as the optimal management of these patients is unknown, the information used is usually based on other procedures. Generally, oral anticoagulation is suspended the days leading to the procedure—depending on the thrombosis risk—using a bridge with low molecular weight heparin.

All consecutive patients receiving oral anticoagulation undergoing transfemoral TAVR at 5 European centers were enrolled. Anticoagulation was either stopped 2 or 4 days before TAVR, or continued throughout the procedure. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding, while secondary efficacy endpoints included vascular complications, stroke, and mortality.

About 584 patients continued with their previous anticoagulation scheme and 733 interrupted it.


Read also: Current DES Performance: Is There Room for Improvement?


At 30 days, the major bleeding or life-threatening bleeding rate was 11.3% vs. 14.3% (odds ratio [OR]: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 1.21; p = 0.39). Vascular complications were also pretty much identical among patients who continued using anticoagulation vs. those who stopped it (11% vs. 12.3%; OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.27; p = 0.52).

Transfusion was less often required in patients with continuation of anticoagulation and 12-month mortality was identical among them.

Conclusion

Continuing oral anticoagulation in patients who will undergo TAVR does not increase bleeding or vascular complications.

Original Title: Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Continuation of Vitamin K Antagonists or Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Reference: Miriam Brinkert et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2020, article in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.062.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

Embolization of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices: Predictors, Prevention, and Management Strategies

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke and, in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure represents an...

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

ACC 2026 | FAST III: vFFR vs FFR in physiology-guided revascularization of intermediate coronary lesions

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions remains a cornerstone in decision-making for coronary revascularization. Although FFR continues to be one of the guideline-recommended references,...