Five-Years After PFO Closure: Procedural Safety and Effectiveness

Five-year outcomes of the randomized REDUCE study showed a continuous benefit from patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure compared with antiplatelet agents to prevent cryptogenic strokes.

5 años del cierre del FOP

The most important aspect of this result seems to be the idea that PFO closure in selected patients offers durable benefit with guaranteed long-term safety.

The original results from REDUCE were presented at the European Stroke Organization Conference in 2017. There, the study demonstrated a 77% recurrent ischemic stroke risk reduction with PFO closure vs. antiplatelet therapy at about 3.2 years of follow-up.

The results presented now in NEJM show that the benefit from this intervention is sustained to prevent recurrent stroke at 5-years of follow-up (1.8% vs. 5.4%; hazard ratio: 0.31; 95% confidence interval: 0.13 to 0.76). In absolute terms, the advantage is 3.6%; therefore, 25 PFO closures are needed to prevent a stroke.

Other safety endpoints like death, major bleeding, and deep venous thrombosis were similar between groups without any further complications related to the device.


Read also: Major Cause of Myocardial Injury by COVID-19.


The only difference against the closing device was a higher risk of atrial fibrillation (6.8% vs. 0.4%). These data require further follow-up, as the increased chances of atrial fibrillation could dilute the benefit in terms of stroke and the increased need for anticoagulation could modify bleeding rates against the device.

Investigators from the REDUCE trial are collaborating with investigators from other large studies on the topic (RESPECT, CLOSE, CLOSURE I, PF, DEFENSE PFO) to produce a large meta-analysis that will shed light on predictors of atrial fibrillation, late stroke, and other complications.

Conclusion

The foramen ovale closure device maintained its superiority in preventing recurrent strokes vs. medical treatment at 5 years of follow-up in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale.

nejmc2033779

Original Title: Five-year outcomes of PFO closure or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke.

Reference: Kasner SE et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:970-971.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II: A New Hope in Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement

Advanced tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a debilitating disease associated with heart failure and increased mortality.  Edge-to-edge repair has been shown to improve both clinical condition...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....