Fenestrated Endografts as Treatment for Type I Endoleak: What is the Price of Success?

Both fenestrated and branched endografts are effective to treat patients after failure of their initial endograft due to significant type I endoleak. This situation is costly both because of the devices themselves, and also due to the several endovascular and surgical procedures required.

Prótesis fenestradas para tratar endoleak tipo 1 ¿cuál es el precio del éxito?

Failure of an endograft to treat an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm due to the development of a type Ia endoleak exposes patients to pressurization of the sac, which may cause a rupture. Type I endoleaks must undoubtedly be treated—unlike type II endoleaks, around which controversy may arise.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of fenestrated/branched grafts for the treatment of type Ia endoleaks.

Between 2010 and 2019, 85 consecutive patients who received a fenestrated/branched graft after failure of a conventional prosthesis were included. The primary endpoint was freedom from re-intervention and death related to the procedure.

In 30 cases (35%), the initial prosthesis was implanted in a hostile neck—either too short (<10mm) or angled (>60°). Less frequent reasons were poor placement of the initial prosthesis, sizing error, or stent migration. 

Type Ia endoleaks were observed 59 ± 25 months following implantation of the initial prosthesis. As a solution, 82 fenestrated grafts and 3 branched grafts were used. Overall technical success was 94%, with one persistent type Ia endoleak, and two unsuccessful stent graft implantations.

In-hospital mortality rate was 5%, and the most feared complication in this type of procedure—spinal cord ischemia—occurred in four patients.


Read also: SOLACI PERIPHERAL | Type Ib Endoleak Correction in Patient After Minimally Invasive Hybrid Treatment in Type A Aortic Disection.


At three years, the survival rate was 64% with an overall freedom from any re-intervention or aneurysm-related death of 40%. However, the secondary patency rate of the target visceral arteries was 96%.

Despite all efforts, six patients had to undergo conventional surgery.

Conclusion

Fenestrated/branched grafts are an effective treatment when conventional prostheses fail due to type 1A endoleak, although re-interventions and device costs can be high.

Original title: Prospective Multicentre Cohort Study of Fenestrated and Branched Endografts After Failed Endovascular Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm Repair with Type Ia Endoleak.

Reference: Aurélien Hostalrich et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Aug 4;S1078-5884(21)00525-6. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.06.019. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...