Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Fenestrated Endografts as Treatment for Type I Endoleak: What is the Price of Success?

Both fenestrated and branched endografts are effective to treat patients after failure of their initial endograft due to significant type I endoleak. This situation is costly both because of the devices themselves, and also due to the several endovascular and surgical procedures required.

Prótesis fenestradas para tratar endoleak tipo 1 ¿cuál es el precio del éxito?

Failure of an endograft to treat an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm due to the development of a type Ia endoleak exposes patients to pressurization of the sac, which may cause a rupture. Type I endoleaks must undoubtedly be treated—unlike type II endoleaks, around which controversy may arise.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of fenestrated/branched grafts for the treatment of type Ia endoleaks.

Between 2010 and 2019, 85 consecutive patients who received a fenestrated/branched graft after failure of a conventional prosthesis were included. The primary endpoint was freedom from re-intervention and death related to the procedure.

In 30 cases (35%), the initial prosthesis was implanted in a hostile neck—either too short (<10mm) or angled (>60°). Less frequent reasons were poor placement of the initial prosthesis, sizing error, or stent migration. 

Type Ia endoleaks were observed 59 ± 25 months following implantation of the initial prosthesis. As a solution, 82 fenestrated grafts and 3 branched grafts were used. Overall technical success was 94%, with one persistent type Ia endoleak, and two unsuccessful stent graft implantations.

In-hospital mortality rate was 5%, and the most feared complication in this type of procedure—spinal cord ischemia—occurred in four patients.


Read also: SOLACI PERIPHERAL | Type Ib Endoleak Correction in Patient After Minimally Invasive Hybrid Treatment in Type A Aortic Disection.


At three years, the survival rate was 64% with an overall freedom from any re-intervention or aneurysm-related death of 40%. However, the secondary patency rate of the target visceral arteries was 96%.

Despite all efforts, six patients had to undergo conventional surgery.

Conclusion

Fenestrated/branched grafts are an effective treatment when conventional prostheses fail due to type 1A endoleak, although re-interventions and device costs can be high.

Original title: Prospective Multicentre Cohort Study of Fenestrated and Branched Endografts After Failed Endovascular Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm Repair with Type Ia Endoleak.

Reference: Aurélien Hostalrich et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Aug 4;S1078-5884(21)00525-6. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.06.019. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

SCAI 2026 | Deep vein arterialization as an alternative in patients with critical limb ischemia without conventional options

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents one of the most advanced stages of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In a significant proportion of patients, distal anatomy,...

C-TRACT: Endovascular therapy in post-thrombotic syndrome due to iliac obstruction

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is one of the most limiting sequelae following proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It clinically manifests as chronic pain, edema, skin...

Coil embolization of segmental arteries as a spinal cord protection strategy prior to complex endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aorta

Spinal cord ischemia remains one of the most devastating complications in the repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, with incidences of up to 20–30% in extensive...

Mechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulation in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) has anticoagulation as the standard treatment, while reperfusion strategies remain a matter of debate. In this context, mechanical thrombectomy has...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...