Lithotripsy in the “Real World”: REPLICA EPIC-18 Study

Severe persistent calcification of the coronary arteries has been associated with different factors, such as advanced age, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and kidney failure, among others, and continues to be one of the challenges to stent implantation because of it impact on device advancing, drug release and adequate positioning. 

Litotricia en el "Mundo Real": Estudio REPLICA EPIC-18

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a technique that uses ultrasound through a balloon to treat calcified lesions. However, we currently lack evidence from large studies and, in general, patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been excluded from them. 

The REPLICA EPIC-18 included 422 patients with 456 calcified lesions treated with IVL: 157 (37.2%) presenting chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and 265 with ACS.

Efficacy primary outcome was defined as successful coronary angioplasty with residual <20% stenosis with no hospital complications, while the safety end point was the presence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days, defined as the composite of death, MI or target vessel revascularization (TVR).

Patient mean age was 73, with 84% of patients with hypertension, 52% with diabetes, 17% with peripheral vascular disease, 37% prior MI, 41% prior PCI, 10% prior CABG and 21% kidney function deterioration. 

Read also: TAVR in the Different Types of Aortic Stenosis.

75% of patients had ACS, 70% presented conserved ventricular function and 6% showed severe ventricular function deterioration. 

76% of procedures were done via transradial approach, and 49% of lesions were considered undilatable. The artery most frequent treated with IVL was the anterior descending (44.5%), followed by the right coronary (32%), the circumflex (21.2%) and the left main (11%). Residual stenosis after stenting was 15% ± 13 mm.

The efficacy primary outcome was reached in 66% of cases and the safety end point in 96.4% with a higher trend towards MACE in ACS patients vs CCS patients (4.5% vs. 1.3%; P= 0.073).

Read also: Physiologically Significant Obstructions in the Left Main Coronary Artery: Revascularizing vs. Deferring.

There were no significant differences in mortality, MI or TVR.

Lack of stent expansion predictors were obstruction length, reference diameter and obstruction percentage. 

Conclusion

Coronary lithotripsy was shown feasible and safe in the “real world”, effectively facilitating stent implantation in severely calcified lesions. Even though ACS patients showed similar successful rates, they presented a tendency towards higher MACE incidence at 30 days, vs. patients with CCS. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Real-World Registry of Coronary Lithotripsy in Calcified Coronary Arteries. The REPLICA-EPIC18 Study.

Reference: Oriol Rodriguez-Leor, et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2024;17:756–767.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...