Ischemia by Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography as a Predictor of PCI Efficacy

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) present a challenge in selecting the most adequate treatment, which entails correctly stratifying for a potential percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

FFR Post Angioplastia

The ORBITA-2 outcomes have shown invasive physiological parameters, such as FFR or iFR, are useful to predict symptom relief after PCI. However, other non-invasive techniques, such as dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), had no solid validation so far. The current clinical guidelines recommend the use of non-invasive diagnostic methods in patients with probable pretest intermediate CAD.

The ORBITA-2 was a randomized double blind placebo controlled study carried out in 14 centers in the UK, designed to assess the symptomatic effect of PCI in patients with stable angina and minimal or no anti angina therapy. This prespecified subanalysis looked at the predictive value of DSE induced ischemia on a post PCI symptomatic response. 

Read also: IVUS Assessment in Patients at High Risk of Coronary Occlusion After TAVI: Results from the ICARO Study.

262 patients with stable angina, single or multivessel disease and evidence of ischemia were included. All patients stopped anti angina medication 48 hours before procedure and were assessed with DSE, stress test, symptom questionnaires (CCS, SAQ, EQ-5D-5L) and the ORBITA mobile application. Mean patient age was 65.5; 79.4 % were men, 80.9 % presented severe stenosis in one coronary territory and 16.8 % in two territories.

DSE score was calculated with a standardized 17 myocardial segment model, pondering segmental dysfunction degree. 94.3 % of patients reached at least 85 % of the target heart rate. 

Outcomes were conclusive: the higher the DSE score, the greater the symptom improvement after PCI vs. placebo. This was shown both by reduced angina scores (OR: 1.69; CI95%: 1.40–2.03) and a drop in daily angina episodes (OR: 1.36; CI95%: 1.24–1.49) and improved SAQ quality of life scores (QoL) (angina frequency: 8.22-points; quality of life: 895 points). This reduction was maintained even in patients with atypical symptoms. 

Read also: Decompensated Aortic Stenosis: Time to TAVR Matters.

Unlike other tools such as FFR or iFR, with a predictive power limited to certain contexts, DSE showed a robust capacity to anticipate clinical benefit, regardless of symptom kind. 

Conclusions

The ORBITA-2 subanalysis reinforces the clinical value of dobutamine stress echocardiography as a non-invasive tool for symptomatic patient selection looking to benefit from PCI. Data presented support its integration into a clinical decision making strategy that prioritizes functional assessment prior revascularization. 

Original Title: Ischemia on Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Predicts Efficacy of PCI: Results From the ORBITA-2 Trial.

Reference: Ahmed-Jushuf F, Foley MJ, Rajkumar CA, Chotai S, Simader FA, Wang D, Macierzanka K, Sehmi J, Kanaganayagam G, Lloyd G, Keenan N, Bual N, Davies JR, Keeble TR, O’Kane PD, Haworth P, Routledge H, Kotecha T, Williams R, Din J, Nijjer SS, Curzen N, Sinha M, Ruparelia N, Gamma R, Spratt JC, Cole GD, Harrell FE Jr, Howard JP, Francis DP, Shun-Shin MJ, Al-Lamee RK; ORBITA-2 Investigators. Ischemia on Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Predicts Efficacy of PCI: Results From the ORBITA-2 Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 May 13;85(18):1740-1753. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.02.034. PMID: 40335250.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

OCT Assessment of Bioresorbable Scaffold Performance across Different Types of Plaque

The development of bioresorbable magnesium scaffolds (RMS) has generated significant expectation in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention, especially because it could potentially restore...

Early Discharge After STEMI: Clinical Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness?

Improvements in reperfusion strategies for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have transformed the prognosis for this condition. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) has enabled...

Can Intense Exercise Modify the Coronary Atherosclerosis Profile?

While physical activity is a widely accepted recommendation for preventing cardiovascular disease, questions remain regarding the impact of very high volumes of exercise. Some...

Polymer-Free vs. Biodegradable Polymer Stents: SORT OUT IX 5-Year Outcomes

In a constant strive to achieve life time management, interventional cardiologists focus on optimizing coronary scaffolds, which calls for the development of devices with...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TAVR in Women

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) in women shows distinct features, compared to men, with lower prevalence of heart disease, among other differences. However, women have...

Early and Late Readmission after Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) represents an effective alternative for patients with atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation contraindication. This study looked at incidence, predictors...

OCT Assessment of Bioresorbable Scaffold Performance across Different Types of Plaque

The development of bioresorbable magnesium scaffolds (RMS) has generated significant expectation in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention, especially because it could potentially restore...