Aortic Valvuloplasty as a Bridge to TAVR: Are We Wasting Our Time?

Doing a balloon aortic valvuloplasty can be a good way to “buy” time before a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), according to a registry to be published this week in J Am Coll Cardiol Intv.

Valvuloplastia aórtica como puente al TAVI

This study analyzed the database of a whole country to find out the incidence, predictors and outcomes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty as a bridge to TAVR in the daily clinical practice. 

Of 3691 patients receiving balloon aortic valvuloplasty between 2015 and 2016, 1426 subsequently received TAVR. TAVR was prior discharge in 7.4%, within 30 days in 35%, between 31 and 90 days in 47%, between 91 and 180 days in 14%, and over 180 days in 4% of patients.

Negative predictors of valvuloplasty patients reaching TAVR (before or after) resulted quite logical and expected. A history of defibrillation, dementia, malnutrition, and severe comorbidities predicted patients would not get to TAVR.


Read also: Tricuspid valve: Is Percutaneous Intervention Feasible in Patients with Definite Pacemaker?


When comparing patients with direct access to TAVR vs. balloon valvuloplasty patients, they found inhospital mortality was practically identical (3.7% vs 3.5% after propensity score matching; p=0.91).

Major complications, hospital-stay and discharge conditions also resulted similar, even though costs increased for those who went directly to TAVR.

Conclusion

In this contemporary registry of the daily practice, up to 40% of patients with severe aortic stenosis received balloon aortic valvuloplasty as bridge to TAVR. Most of them within 90 days. 

Outcomes between those undergoing TAVR directly and those with prior valvuloplasty were similar, which makes it adequate to “buy” time before the end goal. 

Original Title: Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty as a Bridge to Aortic Valve Replacement A Contemporary Nationwide Perspective.

Reference: Akram Kawsara et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2020, article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...