AHA 2020 | AFFIRM-AHF: Ferric Carboxymaltose and Fewer Hospitalizations for Cardiac Failure

Correcting iron deficiency in patients with cardiac failure might reduce the risk of new hospitalizations according to the AFFIRM-AHF published in the Lancet and presented at AHA 2020.

The combined primary end point of death and hospitalizations was not met; yet the study showed a significant reduction of 26% in hospitalization rate.

Irrespective of the presence of anemia, iron deficiency is among the predictors of bad prognosis and is present in over 70% of patients with cardiac failure.

This new study data support the administration of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose for patients with iron deficiency (with or without anemia) and less than 50% ejection fraction. Therefore, rather than a bad prognosis factor, iron deficiency has become a changeable factor. 

AFFIRM-AHF was a multicenter study including 1108 patients hospitalized for cardiac failure. They all had iron deficiency defined as ferritin <100 μg/L, or 100–299 μg/L with transferrin saturation <20%). Mean age was 71 and mean ejection fraction was 33%. Before discharge, patients were randomized to endovenous iron vs. placebo. 


Read also: AHA 2020 | Statins: Confirmed Benefits for the Elderly.


At 52 weeks followup, cardiovascular events rate resulted similar between the branches, as was the combined end point of death and hospitalization. However, when looked at separately, new hospitalization rate saw a significant reduction of 26%.

hierro-en-ICC

Original Title: Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency at discharge after acute heart failure: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

Reference: Ponikowski P et al. Lancet. 2020; Epub ahead of print y presentado en las sesiones científicas del AHA 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...