The FDA Approves a Third Device in the TAVR Race

The Portico self-expanding graft has obtained FDA approval and can now compete as one of the three options available in clinical practice for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States. For the time being, its indication will have some restrictions: for example, it can only be used in high-risk patients (unlike CoreValve and Sapien, both FDA-approved for the whole spectrum of patients).

La FDA aprueba un tercer dispositivo que entra en la competencia del TAVI

The results of the open, prospective trial were first presented during the TCT 2019 Congress, showing that the Portico valve reached non-inferiority against the other two devices approved for clinical practice.

At the time, the composite primary endpoint of safety (all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, life-threatening bleeding, acute renal failure requiring dialysis, or vascular complication >30 days) occurred in 13.8% of patients treated with the new device vs. 9.6% of patients treated with the traditional devices (pfor noninferiority = 0.03).

For the composite efficacy endpoint (death and disabling stroke at 1 year), the Portico valve reached 14.9% vs. 13.4%; it was also non-inferior (p = 0.006).

Additional data on the Portico were published during the London Valves that very same year. The Portico 1 study showed at 2 years an all-cause mortality rate of 19.7%, a cardiovascular death rate of 9.6%, and a stroke rate of 3.1%.

The pacemaker implantation rate was high—22.3% at 2 years—, although identical to that reported at 1 year.


Read also: TAVR and Anticoagulation: Direct Anticoagulant Agents or Vitamin K Inhibitors?


Moderate and severe leaks generated controversy and skepticism. At 2 years, their rate was 1.5%—far from the 7.8% reported at 1 year. These data clearly need more research in every sense of the word.

From now on, the Portico system joins the CoreValve/Evolut self-expanding family by Medtronic, and the Sapien balloon-expandable family manufactured by Edwards.

In total, three devices have been approved for use in clinical practice. What will be next?


Read also: The latest scientific articles on TAVI published on our website.


Boston Scientific had obtained FDA approval for the Lotus; however, after several issues, and because of its complexity, Boston dropped the device redesign and withdrew the valve from the market. Now all of Boston’s efforts are aimed at Acurate Neo2, a much simpler self-expanding system than the mechanically expandable Lotus. Will Acurate be the star of the next announcement?

Original Title: Abbott receives FDA approval for minimally invasive Portico with FlexNav TAVR system to treat patients with aortic valve disease.

Reference: Abbott, 20 de septiembre 2021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...