TCT 2025 | VICTORY Trial: super-high-pressure NC balloon vs. IVL in severely calcified coronary lesions

Recent studies such as ECLIPSE have demonstrated the safety of non-compliant (NC) balloons compared with orbital atherectomy, while IVL has shown efficacy in registries and non-comparative studies. Still, a direct head-to-head evaluation was needed.

The VICTORY Trial (Intravascular Lithotripsy vs. Super-High-Pressure Non-Compliant Balloon for Treatment of Calcified and Refractory Coronary Lesions) was a prospective, multicenter, randomized non-inferiority study.

Patients with acute or chronic coronary syndromes and severely calcified lesions (OCT-guided) requiring DES implantation were included. STEMI and cardiogenic shock were excluded.

Participants were randomized 1:1 to lesion preparation with OPN non-compliant balloon (OPN NCB) or IVL. The primary endpoint was percentage stent expansion (SE) by OCT. Secondary endpoints included adequate (>80%) or optimal (>90%) expansion, procedural success, strategy success, and 30-day safety outcomes.

A total of 282 patients were randomized across Switzerland, Canada, and Poland. Mean age 71 years; 25% women; 30% diabetes; 40% prior MI; ~60% multivessel disease. Most lesions showed severe angiographic calcium and ≥270° calcium burden on OCT.

Regarding the primary outcome, final stent expansion was similar between groups (mean difference: 1.0%, 95% CI −2.45 to 4.45; superiority p=0.57; non-inferiority p<0.0001), confirming the non-inferiority of OPN NCB compared with IVL. The results were consistent across subgroup analyses.

Read also: TCT 2025 | ShortCUT Trial: intravascular lithotripsy vs. cutting balloon in calcified coronary lesions.

Final SE was similar between groups (mean difference 1.0%; 95% CI −2.45 to 4.45; superiority p=0.57; non-inferiority p<0.0001). Secondary outcomes were also comparable, including procedural success (92% vs. 86%) and strategy success (98.6% both). Safety outcomes showed low perforation rates (≤1%) and infrequent MACE (2.9% vs. 8.0%; p=0.081) without significant differences.

Conclusions

OPN NCB achieved stent expansion and safety outcomes similar to IVL, emerging as a more accessible and cost-effective option for OCT-guided treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions.

Presented by Matthias Bossard at TCT 2025 Late-Breaking Clinical Trials, October 26, San Francisco, USA.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....