TCT 2018 | IMPERIAL: First Study Comparing Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with Femoropopliteal Disease

The IMPERIAL trial compared the safety and efficacy of a nitinol self-expanding polymer-free placlitaxel-eluting stent (Zilver PTX, Cook Medical, already approved by the US Food and Drug Administration [FDA]) and a nitinol self-expanding polymer-coating placlitaxel-eluting stent (Eluvia, Boston Scientific).

imperial-TCT 2018This was a single-blind randomized trial in patients with symptomatic intermittent claudication (Rutherford categories 2, 3, or 4) and native superficial femoral artery or proximal popliteal artery lesions.

 

The primary efficacy endpoint was primary vessel patency as determined by Doppler echocardiography at 12 months after the procedure. The primary safety endpoint was all-cause death, target-limb amputation, or repeat revascularization, at 12 months.

 

The trial included 465 patients randomized 2:1 (Eluvia n = 309 and Zilver PTX n = 156). Primary patency in the Eluvia group was 86.8% vs. 81.5% in the Zilver PTX group, thus achieving non-inferiority. The device was also non-inferior as regards safety; there were no deaths and one amputation at 13 months in the Eluvia group, and one revascularization in each group.


Read also: New Atrial Fibrillation After TAVR Indicates Prognosis.


A post hoc analysis showed that, at 9 months, patency in the Eluvia group was superior and the trend towards thrombosis was lower (about 50% less, although the comparison included few patients).

 

Original title: Twelve-Month Results of the IMPERIAL Randomized Trial: Comparing the Eluvia and Zilver PTX Stents for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries.

Presenter: William A. Gray.

 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...