ACC 2019 | The New ACC/AHA Guidelines on Primary Prevention Focus on Life Style, Diet and Socioeconomic Factors.

These guidelines basically remind us that we should focus on life style changes to best prevent heart disease, heart failure and atrial fibrillation. These changes, of course, should be permanent.

ACC 2019 | Las nuevas guías de prevención primaria ACC/AHA con foco en estilo de vida, dieta y factores socioeconómicos.It is estimated that life style changes translate into 80% risk reduction of heart disease.

 

These recommendations are based on 9 topics: risk estimation, diet, physical activity, obesity, diabetes, cholesterol, hypertension, giving up smoking and the use of aspirin.

 

Social factors have been one of the most difficult fronts and the one with most impact. Physicians seldom show concern about whether patients can afford the drugs we prescribe, or whether they will be able to follow a healthy diet.


Read also: ACC 2019 | SAFARI: Unexpectedly, Radial Approach Offers No Benefits In STEMI.


Moreover, we should routinely try to detect psychosocial stressors and support our patients with savvy advice.

 

For adults between 40 and 75, we recommend screening for traditional risk factors and estimating cardiovascular risk at 10 years (recommendation class I).

 

For patients between 20 and 39, it is reasonable to assess risk factors every 4 to 6 years (recommendation class IIa).


Read also: ACC 2019 | POET: Oral Antibiotics with Good Long-Term Results for Endocarditis.


Patients presenting intermediate or border risk could be better stratified with other markers such as family history, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, or C-reactive protein.

 

Guidelines also suggest consuming more vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains and fish, as well as warning against the consumption of salt, fired foods, processed meats and sugary drinks.

 

They recommend 150 minutes of moderate activity (walking, swimming, cycling) or 75 minutes of a more vigorous activity, and if neither were possible, at least 10 minutes can make a significant difference.


Read also: ACC 2019 | Having an Infarction at Very Young Age or 10 Years Later Does Not Change Long-Term Mortality.


As regards aspirin, it is not recommended as primary prevention in >70-year individuals, or with increased bleeding risk (recommendation class III). For individuals between 40 and 70, aspirin can be considered if there is high cardiovascular risk or low bleeding risk (recommendation class IIb). For most patients, aspirin is not indicated as primary prevention.

 

Original title: 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Reference: Arnett DK et al. Circulation 2019; Epub ahead of print.

 

Guias-de-prevención-primaria


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...