ACC 2019 | The New ACC/AHA Guidelines on Primary Prevention Focus on Life Style, Diet and Socioeconomic Factors.

These guidelines basically remind us that we should focus on life style changes to best prevent heart disease, heart failure and atrial fibrillation. These changes, of course, should be permanent.

ACC 2019 | Las nuevas guías de prevención primaria ACC/AHA con foco en estilo de vida, dieta y factores socioeconómicos.It is estimated that life style changes translate into 80% risk reduction of heart disease.

 

These recommendations are based on 9 topics: risk estimation, diet, physical activity, obesity, diabetes, cholesterol, hypertension, giving up smoking and the use of aspirin.

 

Social factors have been one of the most difficult fronts and the one with most impact. Physicians seldom show concern about whether patients can afford the drugs we prescribe, or whether they will be able to follow a healthy diet.


Read also: ACC 2019 | SAFARI: Unexpectedly, Radial Approach Offers No Benefits In STEMI.


Moreover, we should routinely try to detect psychosocial stressors and support our patients with savvy advice.

 

For adults between 40 and 75, we recommend screening for traditional risk factors and estimating cardiovascular risk at 10 years (recommendation class I).

 

For patients between 20 and 39, it is reasonable to assess risk factors every 4 to 6 years (recommendation class IIa).


Read also: ACC 2019 | POET: Oral Antibiotics with Good Long-Term Results for Endocarditis.


Patients presenting intermediate or border risk could be better stratified with other markers such as family history, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, or C-reactive protein.

 

Guidelines also suggest consuming more vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains and fish, as well as warning against the consumption of salt, fired foods, processed meats and sugary drinks.

 

They recommend 150 minutes of moderate activity (walking, swimming, cycling) or 75 minutes of a more vigorous activity, and if neither were possible, at least 10 minutes can make a significant difference.


Read also: ACC 2019 | Having an Infarction at Very Young Age or 10 Years Later Does Not Change Long-Term Mortality.


As regards aspirin, it is not recommended as primary prevention in >70-year individuals, or with increased bleeding risk (recommendation class III). For individuals between 40 and 70, aspirin can be considered if there is high cardiovascular risk or low bleeding risk (recommendation class IIb). For most patients, aspirin is not indicated as primary prevention.

 

Original title: 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Reference: Arnett DK et al. Circulation 2019; Epub ahead of print.

 

Guias-de-prevención-primaria


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....