Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Lotus Returns with New Strength and the FDA Approval to Compete with Sapien3 and CoreValve Evolut R

After reports of some serious adverse events with first-generation Lotus, the device was pulled off the market—but it was not meant to be left in oblivion. Now, it is back, renewed and with the approval of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), to compete directly with the two market leaders (Sapien and CoreValve), which were the only devices approved for the US market so far.

REPRISE III: Leak paravalvular y necesidad de marcapasos con LotusStarting yesterday, there are three percutaneous valves available in the US market; each embodies a different concept and presents advantages and disadvantages. This can be seen as a competition among these devices, but, actually, they will most likely end up supplementing each other. Our responsibility is to find the most appropriate valve for each patient.

 

The FDA has just approved the transcatheter aortic valve replacement system LOTUS Edge for patients at high surgical risk.


Read also: REPRISE III: Lotus and CoreValve Compared in High-Risk or Inoperable Patients.


The FDA decision is supported by the results of the REPRISE III trial, which included the first-generation device and also patients who received the Lotus Edge valve.

 

REPRISE III outcomes were presented at EuroPCR 2017 and showed that the Lotus system was non-inferior to the results of a population receiving both first- and second-generation CoreValve (the latter, Evolut R).

 

Lotus criticism focused on its high rates of need for pacemaker, a problem somewhat solved through a modification to the original design, a change known as “depth guard.” This prevents excessively deep implantations and limits interaction with the outflow tract.


Read also: Lotus Valve in Real Life Patients: the near total lack of leaks is its greatest strength.


The REPRISE III 2-year follow-up (recently published) confirmed the first outcomes for the only valve in the market that allows for full delivery, function assessment, and (in case of unsatisfactory results, such as leak, block, etc.) full recapture, so as to optimize results as much as possible.

 

Patient enrollment for REPRISE IV, including Lotus Edge intermediate-risk patients, started early this year.

 

FDA approval might indirectly increase the use of cerebral protection devices during the procedure, since Boston bought the rights to the Sentinel device last year and there is much speculation about the valve and the cerebral protection device being released for sale as a combined package.

 

Original title: Boston Scientific Receives FDA Approval for LOTUS Edge Aortic Valve System. Published on: April 23, 2019. Accessed on: April 24, 2019.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...