Unilateral Vascular Access in TAVR: Our Main Procedure, Increasingly Minimalist

There has been a significant decline in vascular complications in the last few years due to improvements in device profiles and operator experience on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Luz roja para el TAVI en pacientes de bajo riesgo

Unilateral vascular access for transfemoral TAVR is as safe as bilateral access and it could be more comfortable for patients according to this study recently published in J Am Coll Cardiol Intv.

The aim of this study was to compare the rate and trend of vascular complications with a second arterial access in the contralateral femoral artery during TAVR vs. a unilateral vascular access.

Vascular complications occur in approximately 5% to 8% of the procedures. Many operators use a second arterial access in the contralateral femoral artery to perform an aortic root angiography during prosthesis release and as a safety measure in case of an eventual vascular complication. However, others believe that a second arterial access placed in a site that is ipsilateral and distal to the prosthesis would be an easier option with similar safety.


Read also: Off-hours Primary PCI Still Have the Highest Mortality Rate?


Researchers analyzed the data from the Cleveland Clinic database on patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR from 2014 to 2017. The primary endpoint was the rate of vascular complications.

A total of 1208 patients were included; 83.4% underwent bilateral access and 16.6% underwent double unilateral access. Over the analyzed term, the use of the unilateral access technique increased until it reached 43.7% in 2017.

There was a gradual decline in vascular complications, from 13.7% in 2014 to 7.4% in 2017.


Read also: Net Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs. Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation.


After comparing patients through propensity-score matching, the rate of peripheral vascular complications was similar between bilateral transfemoral access and double unilateral access (10.8% vs. 8.6%); (p = 0.54).

Conclusion

There was a significant decline in the vascular complications rate between 2014 and 2017. Double unilateral access provides similar safety compared with double transfemoral contralateral access  as regards both managing complications and achieving post-procedural comfort.

Original title: Unilateral Access Is Safe and Facilitates Peripheral Bailout During Transfemoral-Approach Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Reference: Shameer Khubber et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019;12:2210–20.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Prospective Analysis of the Feasibility of the PASCAL System for Transcatheter Mitral Repair: OneForAll Registry

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an effective option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation who are at high...

Left Bundle Branch Block after TAVR: What Is Its Impact?

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), which can be either...

Multicenter Experience with 3D Intracardiac Echocardiography for Guiding Interventional Cardiac Procedures

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Imaging techniques play a fundamental role in interventional cardiac procedures. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) appears as an alternative to transesophageal...

Pathology of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Bioprostheses and Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Despite the available long term followup data on of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), bioprosthesis durability continues under debate....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...