Unilateral Vascular Access in TAVR: Our Main Procedure, Increasingly Minimalist

There has been a significant decline in vascular complications in the last few years due to improvements in device profiles and operator experience on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Luz roja para el TAVI en pacientes de bajo riesgo

Unilateral vascular access for transfemoral TAVR is as safe as bilateral access and it could be more comfortable for patients according to this study recently published in J Am Coll Cardiol Intv.

The aim of this study was to compare the rate and trend of vascular complications with a second arterial access in the contralateral femoral artery during TAVR vs. a unilateral vascular access.

Vascular complications occur in approximately 5% to 8% of the procedures. Many operators use a second arterial access in the contralateral femoral artery to perform an aortic root angiography during prosthesis release and as a safety measure in case of an eventual vascular complication. However, others believe that a second arterial access placed in a site that is ipsilateral and distal to the prosthesis would be an easier option with similar safety.


Read also: Off-hours Primary PCI Still Have the Highest Mortality Rate?


Researchers analyzed the data from the Cleveland Clinic database on patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR from 2014 to 2017. The primary endpoint was the rate of vascular complications.

A total of 1208 patients were included; 83.4% underwent bilateral access and 16.6% underwent double unilateral access. Over the analyzed term, the use of the unilateral access technique increased until it reached 43.7% in 2017.

There was a gradual decline in vascular complications, from 13.7% in 2014 to 7.4% in 2017.


Read also: Net Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs. Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation.


After comparing patients through propensity-score matching, the rate of peripheral vascular complications was similar between bilateral transfemoral access and double unilateral access (10.8% vs. 8.6%); (p = 0.54).

Conclusion

There was a significant decline in the vascular complications rate between 2014 and 2017. Double unilateral access provides similar safety compared with double transfemoral contralateral access  as regards both managing complications and achieving post-procedural comfort.

Original title: Unilateral Access Is Safe and Facilitates Peripheral Bailout During Transfemoral-Approach Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Reference: Shameer Khubber et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019;12:2210–20.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

T-TEER: Beyond Traditional Pulmonary Hypertension Thresholds

Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with progressive functional deterioration, heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and increased mortality. In recent years, transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair...

Is left atrial appendage closure safe in patients with reduced ejection fraction?

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were excluded from the major randomized trials evaluating percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), and...

Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Spain: Sustained Growth and Favorable Real-World Outcomes

Oral anticoagulation remains the standard treatment for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, many patients have a high bleeding risk or contraindications...

HERA-TAVI: Intra-Annular vs Supra-Annular Valves in TAVI

 The HERA-TAVI study is an international multicenter registry that compared the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of contemporary self-expanding transcatheter heart valves with intra-annular (IA)...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: When Should They Be Used?

Peripheral drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of peripheral arterial disease by reducing restenosis rates and the need for repeat interventions. However, the emergence...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...