Virtual ACC 2020 | More Evidence in Support of the Demanding 2017 Hypertension Guidelines

It’s been a while since the demanding and tough 2017 document written jointly between ACC and AHA where, with much controversy, cutoff hypertension values were taken to extreme limits. In fact, more flexible ESC guidelines came out a few months later.

Despite this document, hypertension-related cardiovascular death kept increasing in the US across all age subgroups and regions. 

Results from the present analysis are along the line of prior observational studies. The downward trend in cardiovascular mortality has been slowing down while death for cardiac failure has begun to climb. 

Data to be presented by Dr. Nambiar at the frustrated ACC 2020, to be published simultaneously in JACC, show death for hypertension adjusted by age every 100.000 persons has risen from 18.3 in 2007 to 23 in 2017 (p<0.001 for this trend).


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | Myocardial Ischemia Induced by Sudden Mental Stress.


During this same period, cardiovascular death related to hypertension increased 72% in rural US vs 20% in cities (p<0.001 for this trend).

Mortality has increased across all age groups, with the highest impact in people ranging from 65 to 74, for both sexes, but mostly for men.


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | “Dangerous” Plaques by CT Effectively Predict Infarction.


The reasons behind this increase are multiple, but clearly diabetes and hypertension epidemics weigh on.

Adjusting to the new cutoff values set in 2017 seems critical.

Original title: Decade long temporal trends in U.S. hypertension related cardiovascular mortality.

Reference: Nambiar L et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...