Self-Expanding Valve vs. Balloon-Expandable Valve, Randomized, Head to Head

The “arms race”among transcatheter valves has been vertiginous. By the time we received the mid- or long-term outcomes of studies focused on a given valve, we were already using its next generation in clinical practice.

TAVI: Balón expandible o autoexpandible ¿Cuál es la respuesta?

As a result, there is little information addressing which valve is the best.

Nowadays, this “arms race” has reached a plateau. There is a third generation for the two most frequent commercially available valves, including design changes to solve the same problems (access profile, rate of pacemaker implantation, paravalvular leak, proper implantation).

SOLVE-TAVI is a multicenter trial that included 447 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement who were randomized to self-expanding valve (Evolut R, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) or balloon-expandable valve (Sapien 3, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA).


Read also: In Search of the Optimal Depth for Self-Expandable Valves.


The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation, and permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days.

The composite endpoint occurred in 28.4% of patients who received Evolut R vs. 26.1% of patients who received Sapien 3 (Pequivalence = 0.04)

The individual components also met the equivalence criteria, with the following rates: all-cause mortality, 3.2% vs. 2.3%; stroke, 0.5% vs. 4.7%; moderate/severe paravalvular regurgitation, 3.4% vs. 1.5%; and permanent pacemaker implantation, 23% vs. 19.2%.

Conclusion

The newer generations of the two most used commercially available valves were equivalent as regards the efficacy and safety endpoints in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

These findings support the equal use of both valves in most patients, with some specific preferences based on individual valve anatomy.

Original Title: Comparison of newer generation self-expandable vs. balloon-expandable valves in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the randomized SOLVE-TAVI trial.

Reference: Holger Thiele et al. European Heart Journal (2020) 41, 1890–1899 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa036.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Transapical TMVR in High Risk Patients: Intrepid 5-Year Outcomes

Moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) continues is still a high prevalence condition with bad prognosis, particularly among the elderly with left ventricular...

Impact of Balloon Post-Dilation on the Long-Term Durability of Bioprostheses after TAVR

Balloon post-dilation (BPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) allows for the optimization of prosthesis expansion and the reduction of residual paravalvular aortic regurgitation....

TAVR in Pure Native Aortic Regurgitation: Are Dedicated Devices Truly Superior?

This systematic meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with pure native aortic regurgitation. The emergence of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Endoleaks after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: always reintervene or monitor with CTA?

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms requiring sealing above the renal arteries, with preservation of visceral vessels using fenestrated and/or branched devices (F/B-EVAR), has become...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...