IVUS in Every Step of Complex Angioplasty

Complex angioplasties require not only experience and patience but also technology. Imaging–guided pre-dilation, stent sizing, and post-dilation reduced the cardiovascular events after a 3-year follow-up in patients who received drug-eluting stents in complex angioplasties.

El uso del ultrasonido intravascular en la angioplastia de tronco no protegido se asocia con mejores resultados en comparación con la angioplastia guiada solo por angiografía.

This paper, recently published in JACC Interventions, compared the 3-year outcome of the complex angioplasty optimization technique with intravascular imaging to “customize” every step of the procedure.

Researchers evaluated 9,525 patients from the IRIS-DES (Interventional Cardiology Research In-cooperation Society-Drug-Eluting Stents) registry who underwent angioplasty in the left main coronary artery, bifurcation lesions, long or diffuse (>30mm) lesions, or severe calcification. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used in 89.5% of patients (n = 8522).

IVUS was conducted in every step of the procedure (pre-dilation, stent sizing, and post-dilation) for just over a third of patients (35.4%) This subgroup was defined as the optimized complex angioplasty arm.


Read also: IVUS in Unprotected LMCA Angioplasty: Should We Change the Way We Use It?


After 3 years of follow-up, those who underwent optimized angioplasty had a significantly lower risk of suffering adverse events (5.6% vs. 7.9%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63 to 0.81; p < 0.001).

This difference was significant, even when IVUS was used in the rest of the population in at least one step of the procedure.

These results confirm data from the ULTIMATE and the IVUS-XPL.

Conclusion

Patients who undergo complex coronary angioplasty where IVUS is performed in every step of the procedure experience fewer adverse events after 3-years of follow-up. All-step optimization should be actively applied in routine practice.

Original Title: Optimal Stenting Technique for Complex Coronary Lesions. Intracoronary Imaging-Guided Pre-Dilation, Stent Sizing, and Post-Dilation.

Reference: Hanbit Park et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2020;13:1403–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.023.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...