TCT 2020 | Initial Studies Show Incredible Results with Lithotripsy in Calcified Lesions

Intravascular coronary lithotripsy shows promise for the improvement of angioplasty in severely calcified lesions, according to data from the DISRUPT CAD III study, published in JACC and simultaneously presented at the TCT 2020 Congress.

Calcification in all patients enrolled was highly severe, with an average length of 48 mm, and side-branch involvement in 30% of cases.

Lithotripsy, which involves using acoustic pressure waves to fracture calcium, was well tolerated with low rates of complications.

Observed results were confirmed by pre- and post-procedure intravascular imaging.

DISRUPT CAD III enrolled 431 patients in 47 sites presenting severely calcified de novo coronary artery lesions with reference diameters between 2.5 mm and 4.0 mm.


Read also: TCT 2020 | Fewer Symptoms and Events when Optimizing with iFR.


The primary safety endpoint was observed in 92.2% of patients. Similarly, the effectiveness endpoint occurred in 92.4%. Both endpoints exceeded expectations.

Previous reports indicated the possibility of ventricular capture with shock waves, something that was observed in this study. Said captures were not associated with sustained ventricular arrhythmias during or immediately after the procedure, and they did not correlate with adverse events either.

Conclusion

Coronary lithotripsy was safe and effective in facilitating stent implantation and expansion in highly calcified lesions.

DISRUPT-CAD-III

Original Title: Intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary artery disease: the DISRUPT CAD III study.

Reference: Hill JM et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; Epub ahead of print y presentado simultáneamente en el congreso TCT 2020 virtual.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...