AHA 2020 | Statins: Confirmed Benefits for the Elderly

Elderly patients (>70) with high cholesterol levels have been systematically excluded from randomized studies on statins, despite their higher risk of cardiovascular events. Presented at AHA 2020 Scientific Sessions and published simultaneously in the Lancet, along comes this primary prevention study including patients between 70 and 100 years of age. 

The use of therapies to reduce cholesterol in the elderly population (statins, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors) reduces cardiovascular events rate as effectively as in the younger population.

The risk is cut down by 26% for every 39 mg/dl reduction in LDL regardless the age (p=0.37 for interaction).

Baseline events rate in the elderly is higher and yet the relative risk rate of events with cholesterol reduction therapies is similar to that of the younger population. Therefore, the impact of higher cholesterol on cardiovascular events in the elderly, in absolute terms, is significant. 

Many physicians share the idea that if a patient over 70 has not been on any anti-cholesterol treatment, and has not had any cardiovascular events, it’s because they are extremely healthy; they think adding statins as primary prevention to this population will only increase costs and eventually adverse effects brought by these drugs. However, we should forget the claim that states the benefit of statins in the elderly population is the same as their benefit for the younger population. 


Read also: In-Stent Restenosis Treatment: Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Studies.


ACC/AHA guidelines should be compared against these new data. The study suggests a 75-year-old threshold, or younger, for intense anti-cholesterol therapy and flexible recommendations for the elderly. 

estatinas-en-anosos

Original Title: Elevated LDL cholesterol and increased risk of myocardial infarction and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in individuals aged 70-100 years: a contemporary primary prevention cohort.

Reference: Mortensen MB et al. Lancet. 2020; Epub ahead of print y presentado simultáneamente en las sesiones científicas del AHA 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | VANISH2 Trial

Cardiac defibrillator implants (CDIs) have been shown to improve survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, approximately one third of...

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...