EuroPCR 2026 | Restoring vascular physiology: 4-year results of the BIOADAPTOR-RCT

Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, device-related events continue to increase beyond the first year after angioplasty. In this context, the DynamX system emerged as a sirolimus-eluting coronary bioadaptor designed to overcome one of the main limitations of conventional stents: the loss of physiological vessel function.

Unlike a traditional stent, which maintains a permanently rigid structure, DynamX features a helical architecture initially connected by a bioabsorbable polymer. After approximately 6 months, this polymer is resorbed and the metallic struts are partially released, allowing recovery of a certain degree of pulsatility, conformability, and adaptive vascular remodeling while maintaining luminal support. The BIOADAPTOR-RCT compared this device against a contemporary zotarolimus-eluting drug-eluting stent (Resolute Onyx DES).

The primary endpoint was Target Lesion Failure (TLF), while secondary endpoints included Target Vessel Failure (TVF), cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization.

A total of 445 patients from 34 international centers were randomized 1:1 to the DynamX bioadaptor (223 patients) or Resolute Onyx DES (222 patients). Mean age was 67 years, 22% were women, and approximately one-third presented with acute coronary syndrome. Complex lesions were present in about 22% of cases, and 4-year clinical follow-up reached 98%.

Read also: EuroPCR 2026 | Rotational atherectomy, orbital atherectomy, or lithotripsy: does device selection modify prognosis?

At 4 years, the bioadaptor demonstrated a significant reduction in TLF compared with conventional DES (2.8% vs 7.8%; p=0.020). Lower cardiovascular mortality was also observed (0.5% vs 3.7%; p=0.020), along with lower rates of target vessel myocardial infarction (0.9% vs 1.8%) and clinically driven revascularization (1.4% vs 2.8%). The benefit became evident mainly after 6 months, coinciding with the time when the device acquires its dynamic behavior.

In subgroup analysis, lesions in the left anterior descending artery showed a particularly marked benefit, with TLF rates of 2.7% with the bioadaptor versus 10.6% with DES (p=0.021). Likewise, target vessel failure was significantly lower with DynamX (3.3% vs 8.2%; p=0.025).

Conclusion: The DynamX bioadaptor reduced cardiovascular events and improved long-term PCI durability at 4 years

The 4-year follow-up of the BIOADAPTOR-RCT showed that the DynamX coronary bioadaptor was associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular and device-related events compared with a contemporary DES. These findings suggest that partially restoring vascular physiology may improve the long-term durability of coronary angioplasty.

Original Title: BIOADAPTOR RCT Outcomes at 4-Year Follow Up: Randomized Controlled Trial of Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Drug-Eluting Stent.

Reference: Presented by Futoshi Yamanaka at EuroPCR 2026.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: When Should They Be Used?

Peripheral drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of peripheral arterial disease by reducing restenosis rates and the need for repeat interventions. However, the emergence...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...