AHA 2018 | PIONEER-HF: Sacubitril/Valsartan in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Treating acute decompensated heart failure patients with an angiotensin receptor inhibitor plus a neprilysin receptor inhibitor significantly reduces N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations and clinical events, according to the PIONEER-HF study presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) Congress Scientific Sessions and published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

AHA 2018 | PIONEER-HF: sacubitril/valsartan en insuficiencia cardíaca aguda descompensadaThe study showed that the clinical benefit was driven by a 44% reduction in heart failure rehospitalizations. Additionally, the sacubitril/valsartan combination was well tolerated, with comparable rates of worsening renal function, hyperkalemia, symptomatic hypotension, or angioedema when compared with enalapril alone.

 

This treatment initiated in the hospital can be continued in the long term, as proven by the PARADIGM-HF trial in 2014.

 

The PIONEER-HF study included patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction and elevated NT-proBNP concentrations in a setting of acute decompensation.


Read also: AHA 2018 | No Benefits with Methothrexate as Anti-Inflammatory Drug.


All patients had to be stable before randomization, i.e. with a 100 mmHg blood pressure, no increase in the use of intravenous diuretics, no use of intravenous vasodilators in the preceding 6 hours, and no use of inotropes during the preceding 24 hours.

 

There was a 29% reduction in the primary endpoint, defined as the change in NT-proBNP concentrations from baseline to weeks 4 and 8.

 

Original title: Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

Reference: Velazquez EJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Epub ahead of print.

 

PIONEER-HF-presentación

PIONEER-HF-artículo-original


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

Ultrathin vs Thin-Strut Stents in PCI Patients at High Bleeding Risk

Several in vivo studies have shown that ultrathin stents present lower thrombogenic risk vs. thin-strut stents, which reflects in lower rates of target lesion...

Should We Withdraw Anticoagulation Before TAVR?

Approximately one-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have atrial fibrillation and are on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. This creates a complex...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....