TCT 2020 | TAVR Appears to Be the Solution for All Dysfunctional Biological Valves

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) results durable at 5 years to treat failed surgical bioprosthetic valves and at one year to treat valves percutaneously. Regardless the type of the failed valve, the solution is TAVR.

TCT 2020 | El TAVI parece la solución para todas las válvulas biológicas disfuncionantes

The 5 year follow up of the PARTNER 2 valve-in-valve (ViV) showed that TAVR as treatment for failed surgical bioprosthetic valves in high risk or inoperable patients has similar prognosis to TAVR for native valves and moderate risk patients. The benefit in terms of hemodynamics, functional capacity and quality of life is the same. 

The PARTNER 2 ViV included 365 patients (mean age 79) at high or extreme surgical risk (mean STS 9.1%) and severe aortic stenosis for severe failure of a bioprosthesis valve of +21 mm diameter, to be treated with a 23 or 26 mm Sapien XT. 

At 5 year follow up, all-cause mortality was 50.6% and severe deterioration of the new prosthesis was 2.3%.


Read also: TCT 2020 | Surprising Differences in Stroke between SAPIEN 3 and Evolut R.


In the same session at TCT 2020 the international registry TRANSIT was presented, which showed TAVR as a safe and effective option to treat prior TAVR with a degenerated bioprosthesis. 

Considering a second TAVR procedure when the first valve has severely deteriorated seems logical seeing as TAVR had already been chosen against surgery in in the first place. 

172 TAVR patients were registered to treat failed TAVR, the most frequent mode of failure being regurgitation (n=97), then stenosis (n=57) and lastly mixed disease (n=18).


Read also: TCT 2020 | Fewer Symptoms and Events when Optimizing with iFR.


The second prosthesis was implanted successfully in all patients, even though according VARC 2 criteria, success rate was 79%, mainly because of 14% residual gradient and 7% regurgitation. 

Total mortality and cardiovascular mortality were 10% and 5.8% respectively. Other adverse events registered at one-year followup were hospitalization for cardiac failure (11%), stroke (3.5%), valve thrombosis (1.4%) and myocardial infarction (1.2%). Only 12.8% stayed in FC CF III-IV at one year.

Original Title: Five-year follow-up from the aortic valve-in-valve registries y TRANSIT: treatment of failed TAVR with TAVR.

Reference: Hahn RT y Testa L. Ambos trabajos fueron presentados durante el TCT 2020 virtual.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

TCT 2025 | SUMMIT-MAC: Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement with the Tendyne System in Patients with Severe Annular Calcification

The prospective, multicenter SUMMIT-MAC study evaluated the safety and efficacy of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using the Tendyne system in patients with severe...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....