Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Vascular Disease

Everybody keeps wondering whether drug-coated balloons can actually increase mortality. If that is the case, there is an even harder question in need of an answer: what would be the physiopathology for such increase in mortality?

Seguridad de los balones con paclitaxel en enfermedad vascular periférica

As a lukewarm message, the US Food and Drug Administration recommended a special informed consent form when these devices are used, but nothing more definitive.

The last systematic review and meta-analysis, which included works that were rather uneven, showed an increase in mortality for patients who received paclitaxel-eluting stents or balloons in peripheral disease.

This work, which will be published in J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. in the next days, brings us some more information and peace of mind about paclitaxel devices.


Read also: New FDA Updates on Paclitaxel Device Outcomes.


Researchers evaluated 1093 patients who underwent paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty and 250 patients who underwent conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of the femoropopliteal artery, included in the LEVANT 1 (The Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Prevention of Femoropopliteal Restenosis) trial, the LEVANT 2 (Moxy Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries) trial, and the LEVANT Japan Clinical Trial.

There were no significant differences as regards mortality between study arms. At 5 years, the risk was 1.01 (95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 1.52) considering the LEVANT trials as a whole.

Adverse events and causes of death were well balanced, and there was no trend towards a specific cause of death.

Variables predicting mortality included, among others, age, prior treatment of target lesion, arrhythmia, and diabetes, without differences between the two arms.


Read also: The FDA Affirms Mortality Signs with Paclitaxel Based Devices.


There was no association between drug dose and effect after adjustment for all predictors.

Conclusion

The analysis of all patients participating in the LEVANT trials with paclitaxel-coated balloon Lutonix showed no significant differences in mortality as regards patients who received conventional balloons.

Original title: Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease.

Reference: Kenneth Ouriel et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019, online before print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation with a Self-Expanding Valve: Outcomes at 3 Years

Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) is a common condition in patients who have undergone surgical repair of Tetralogy of Fallot or other pathologies involving the right...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...