Evolution of Renal Denervation at 24 Months

Arterial hypertension is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular events. In many cases, however, patients struggle to maintain control over time.

Evolución de la denervación renal a 24 meses

Renal denervation (RDN) has emerged as a therapeutic strategy for arterial hypertension, showing benefits in lowering blood pressure both in 24-hour ambulatory monitoring (ABPM) and in office measurements (OFFICE). However, results have not been conclusive in some analyses.

Researchers conducted an analysis at two years of the SPIRAL HTN-ON MED study, which included 337 patients with uncontrolled hypertension who were receiving between 1 and 3 antihypertensive drugs. The assessment was carried out through OFFICE and ABPM blood pressure measurements. Among the subjects, 206 underwent RDN while the acted as the control group (CG).

Read also: Pulsed-Field Ablation: Proximity to Coronary Vessels and the Unresolved Issue of Induced Vasospasm.

Uncontrolled hypertension was defined as OFFICE systolic blood pressure >150 mmHg and <180 mmHg, with diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, and ABPM systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and <170 mmHg.

Baseline characteristics were similar between groups: the mean age was 55 years and 80% of subjects were men. Hypertension duration was greater than 5 years in most patients; approximately 6% had coronary, 13% had diabetes, preserved renal function, and a stroke/TIA rate of 1%.

Initial blood pressure was 163/101 mmHg in OFFICE and 149/106 mmHg in ABPM. There were no differences in the number of drugs received between groups (1.8 in RDN vs. 1.7 in CG).

Read also: TRIPLACE Registry: Conduction Disorders Following Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement.

At 24 months, there was a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure in ABPM (−12.1±15.3 mmHg vs. −7.0±13.1 mmHg; difference between treatments: −5.7 mmHg; p=0.039). This reduction was sustained during both day and night and was accompanied by a decrease in the medication used.

Conclusion

Renal denervation achieves a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure, both ambulatory and in office, at 24 months compared with the control group, despite the greater use of antihypertensive medication in the latter.

Original Title: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation: 24-Month Results From the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Trial

Reference: David E. Kandzari, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025;18:e015194. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015194. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...