EuroPCR 2019 | Leaflex: New Device for Pre-TAVR Calcium Fracture

Researchers behind this small study believe that fracturing the rigid calcium deposits on leaflets with this new device could delay the need for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or facilitate it. This device showed actual improvement of leaflet mobility together with mean gradient reduction.

The Leaflex Performer system (Pi-Cardia) was used in 16 patients with planned TAVR, though researchers speculate that this tech could be used not only for valve predilation in the context of TAVR, but also as a treatment per se.

The Leaflex device creates multiple fractures on the leaflet by fracturing calcium deposits and restoring valve flexibility, while preserving the native valve.

The device includes nitinol elements that expand the valve and compress and fracture the calcium; this would be the difference with valvuloplasty, that can only stretch the valve after the almost immediate recoil.


Read also: EuroPCR 2019 | TAVR Durability Offers Certain Guarantees at 8 and 10 Years.


The Leaflex was successfully introduced in all 16 patients that tested it and managed to break the calcium in 11, increasing valve area from 0.7 cm2 to 1.2 cm2, while reducing mean gradient from 34 to 18 mmHg. All these changes were statistically significant.

The device seems promising, and though the study was not on “all comers”, the study population was carefully selected.

As regards safety, there was a non-cardiac death not related to the procedure at 16 days. Two events were stroke, but neither embolic.

Leaflex-europcr

Original Title: Safety, feasibility, and acute performance of the Leaflex Performer when used pre-TAVI in aortic stenosis patients: the Leaflex feasibility study.

Presenter: Baumbach A.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....