This work compared the safety and efficacy of the culotte technique versus the use of self-expanding Biolimus A9 (AXXESS) eluting stent evaluating the healing of the vessel by OCT besides quantitative angiography and clinical events. In one, group (n = 20) bifurcated stent system AXXESS plus everolimus-eluting stents in the main distal branch and side...
Bruckheimer, Elchanan (Israel)2014-04-25
Dangas , George D. (USA)2014-04-25
This multicenter work from Japanrandomized 3200 patients to receive biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stent(Nobori) or everolimus-eluting stent with permanent polymer (Xience / Promus). The primary end point for efficacy was any revascularizationlesion. A two year follow up the Nobori stent was non-inferior to death or myocardial infarction (7.83% versus 7.69%) and TLR (6.23% versus 5.95%). ...
The use of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents is controversial in some clinical situations in patients at high risk of bleeding.This study randomized 1606 patients considered at low risk of restenosis but with high risk of bleeding receiving Zotarolimus eluting stent (Endeavor) or conventional stent.The clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups with...
SORT OUT V randomized trial (Odense University Hospital, Denmark) compared Nobori stent, a drug-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer eluting biolimus, versus CYPHER a drug-eluting stent with permanent polymer in the real world. Danish researchers used a non-inferiority design, by means of a primary objective of the study, the combined rate of major cardiac events (cardiac...
The EVOLUTION study, (Dr. Junbo Ge, Shanghai Institute, China), compared two sirolimus-eluting stents, one with permanent polymer (Cypher Select, Cordis Corporation, Miami Lakes, Florida, USA) and another with degradable polymer (Excel, JW Medical System Ltd, Weihai, China). A randomized (2:1) was used, open and non-inferiority, including 1923 patients in 30 centers in China (December 2008...
This randomized trial with an initial plan to include 1832 patients, compared stent implantation guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) versus optimal medical treatment. In this study, we invasively evaluated the severity of lesion by FFR. Of this population, only patients who had lesions with significant translesional gradient (FFR <0.9) were included in the study...
Randomized prospective study comparing the everolimus-eluting polymer-coated stent versus a biodegradable polymer with biolimus coated stent. While the use of first generation DES effectively reduces restenosis and reintervention rates, several meta-analyzes have shown a higher rate of late events of thrombotic origin associated with inflammatory phenomena and delayed reendothelialization at the site of implantation compared...
Randomized trial (n = 1161 patients in 16 centers) comparing a coated stent with biodegradable biolimus polymer (Biomatrix) versus uncoated stent (Gazelle) in patients with AMI with ST segment elevation. While there is no doubt about the effectiveness of first generation SF to reduce the rate of reoperations compared with non-drug eluting stents, there is...