eluting stent

RIBS IV: Drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent on in-stent restenosis

This prospective, multicenter, randomized trial compared the paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent to treat patients with in-stent restenosis. 309 patients were included in total (154 received the drug-eluting balloon, and 155 received the everolimus-eluting stent). There were no differences in the characteristics of both groups. At one year the rate of cardiac death, myocardial infarction...

NOBORI II: Final 5-year results of drug-eluting stent with bio-absorbable polymer

This study evaluated the performance of Nobori biolimus bio-absorbable polymer stent in real-world patients. A total of 3067 consecutive patients followed up to 5 years were included. The rate of target lesion (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization) was 3.9% at one year and 5.1% at 2 years. Long-term clinical performance...

COMPARE II: biolimus eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus everolimus at 3 years.

This study randomized 2:1 – 2707 patients to biolimus eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus everolimus eluting stent with permanent polymer. At one year, the results were similar demonstrating the biolimus eluting stent noninferiority. At three years cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization rates remained similar with 11% for biolimus eluting stent and...

SORT OUT V: Comparison of drug-eluting stents: One with degradable polymer releasing biolimus and the other a permanent polymer sirolimus stent.

SORT OUT V randomized trial (Odense University Hospital, Denmark) compared Nobori stent, a drug-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer eluting biolimus, versus CYPHER a drug-eluting stent with permanent polymer in the real world. Danish researchers used a non-inferiority design, by means of a primary objective of the study, the combined rate of major cardiac events (cardiac...

EVOLUTION: Comparative study of non-inferiority of two sirolimus eluting stents: One with permanent polymer and the other with degradable polymer.

The EVOLUTION study, (Dr. Junbo Ge, Shanghai Institute, China), compared two sirolimus-eluting stents, one with permanent polymer (Cypher Select, Cordis Corporation, Miami Lakes, Florida, USA) and another with degradable polymer (Excel, JW Medical System Ltd, Weihai, China). A randomized (2:1) was used, open and non-inferiority, including 1923 patients in 30 centers in China (December 2008...

COMPARE II: A randomized prospective study compared the permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer biolimus coated stent.

Randomized prospective study comparing the everolimus-eluting polymer-coated stent versus a biodegradable polymer with biolimus coated stent.  While the use of first generation DES effectively reduces restenosis and reintervention rates, several meta-analyzes have shown a higher rate of late events of thrombotic origin associated with inflammatory phenomena and delayed reendothelialization at the site of implantation compared...

Top