Use of IVUS in Complex PCI: Results according to Operator Experience

The use of ultravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to guide coronary angioplasty procedures (PCI) has been shown to reduce the risk of major adverse events in numerous randomized controlled studies, registries and meta-analysis. 

¿Es frecuente el uso de IVUS para guiar la ATC?

The current guidelines recommend the use of IVUS in left main disease and complex lesions. The proportion of complex PCI procedures has increased over time, as well as operator experience. 

Several studies have shown high volume centers, or those with experienced operators, are associated with a significant reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events vs. low volume centers or those with less experienced operators. 

The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to to evaluate the influence of operator experience on lesion complexity, long-term clinical outcomes, and the interactions of IVUS guidance in patients undergoing complex PCI. 

Read also: Retrograde Approach to Chronic Total Occlusions: Techniques and Outcomes According to the PROGRESS-CTO Registry.

Primary end point was a combination of cardiovascular death or target vessel MI (TVMI) at 10 years. Secondary end point included cardiac death rate at 10 years, acute MI, TVMI, definite or probable stent thrombosis and ischemia driven target lesion revascularization (TLR).

From the total of patients with complex coronary artery disease, 63.4% received PCI from experienced operators, while 36.6% received PCI from less experienced operators. 

Experience operators used IVUS more frequently in complex lesions and had higher annual volume of PCI vs. less experienced operators. Also, more experience operators presented higher SYNTAX score, higher number and longer lesions, with more left main compromise.  Patients receiving IVUS guided PCI were younger, and had fewer cardiovascular risk factors, and prior MI and cardiovascular events. 

Read also: Dissection and Re-Entry Technique in Chronic Total Occlusions: Data from the PROGRESS-CTO Registry.

As regards outcomes, experienced operators saw lower risk of cardiac death or TVMI vs. less experienced operators (HR: 0.779; CI 95%: 0.663-0.915; P = 0.002). The use of IVUS was associated with a significant lower risk of cardiac death and TVMI vs angiography guided PCI, both for less experienced (23.5% vs 11.4%; HR: 0.477; CI 95%: 0.337-0.673; P < 0.001) and more experienced operators (18.0% vs 13.5%; HR: 0.747; CI 95%: 0.559-0.998; P = 0.048). There was a significant interaction for the risk of cardiac death or TVMI between the use of IVUS and operator experience (P=0.037).

Conclusion

Between patients with complex CAD, the use of IVUS guided PCI was associated with better long term outcomes vs. angiography guided PCI, regardless operator experience. Also, the beneficial effects of IVUS were more prominent when complex PCI procedures were carried out by less experienced operators. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Prognostic Impact of Operator Experience and IVUS Guidance on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Complex PCI.

Reference: Ki Hong Choi, MD, PHD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:1746–1758.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. In this context, the IVUS-CHIP trial was designed to evaluate...

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...

The Two Sides of the Coin: What Do CHAMPION-AF and CLOSURE-AF Teach Us About Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

Letter to the editor: Juan Manuel Pérez Asorey Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is currently going through one of the most interesting stages of...

CLOSURE-AF: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, comparative...