Regardless of whether it is attempted through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or myocardial revascularization surgery (MRS), complete revascularization (CR) is not always achieved. Overall, it is more frequent with surgery than with percutaneous treatment. Additionally, incomplete revascularization (IR) has proven to be associated with worse outcomes compared to CR. Researchers conducted an analysis of the...
The population over 75 is growing gradually, which entails an increase in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in this group. As we all know, it is fairly common for AMI to present with multivessel disease. It has been shown that younger patients will benefit from complete revascularization vs. a simple resolution of the culprit vessel. However,...
Patients over 75 with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are often badly represented in most significant studies. In this context, the FIRE study looked to determine whether physiology guided complete revascularization is superior to culprit-only revascularization in elderly patients with multivessel disease suffering acute MI. The study included SCA patients over 75, hospitalized for both STEMI...
In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and multivessel disease, complete revascularization is associated with better clinical outcomes. However, for non-culprit vessel revascularization the strategy remains unclear. The aim of this multicenter, open label, randomized, non-inferiority study, was to determine whether complete revascularization during index procedure is non inferior vs. staged. Primary end point was...
The COMPLETE study has shown complete revascularization in STEMI reduces cardiovascular mortality or new AMI, which generated a change in ACC/AHA 2021 revascularization guidelines. However, its impact on quality of life is yet to be studied. The aim of this prespecified analysis of the COMPLETE study is to determine whether complete revascularization improves quality of...
Patients initially receiving pharmacoinvasive strategy for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) also presenting multivessel disease consistently benefit from complete revascularization. This benefit is similar to that of primary PCI. The COMPLETE showed that staged non-culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduced major cardiovascular events in STEMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This benefit was...
Functional assessment with fractional flow reserve (FFR) was not better than conventional angiography to guide complete revascularization in patients with multivessel lesions in a setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and successful primary angioplasty. These results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and presented during the American College of Cardiology (ACC)...
This COMPLETE sub-study using optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed the prevalence of vulnerable lesions other than the culprit which should provide a physiopathological explanation of the benefit of complete revascularization observed in the original study. STEMI patients with multivessel disease will benefit from complete revascularization in terms of reduced cardiovascular death and repeat MI according...
Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Primary coronary angioplasty has been the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction (MI) for many years, but such strategy is associated with nonculprit lesions in a large group of patients. While it has been proven that nonculprit-lesion revascularization offers better outcomes, the groups that would benefit from it are...
Staged complete revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease is superior to culprit PCI only at five-year follow-up. The outcomes of this retrospective analysis show the benefit of staged PCI, though it might be attenuated in diabetic patients. Outcomes are consistent with previously published randomized studies. Nevertheless, we should remain cautious...