The use of transcatheter mitral valve intervention for the treatment of mitral valve regurgitation (MR) continues to evolve; at present guidelines only recommend it for inoperable or high surgical risk patients. So far, many devices have been assessed, some of which have shown promising results, but only for poor surgical candidates. Researchers looked into the...
Lithotripsy in the Left Main Coronary Artery
A lesion ≥50% in the left main coronary artery (LMCA) is considered severe, according to various scientific societies, regardless of the presence of symptoms or ischemia, due to the extent of myocardium at risk. In such cases, revascularization is indicated. In many patients, lesions in this section of the coronary artery have severe calcification, which...
Short-Term Outcomes of TAVR in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is indicated for symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), while close follow-up is recommended for asymptomatic patients, unless they have elevated aortic gradients, low ejection fraction, or abnormal stress tests. However, the optimal timing to perform AVR is uncertain, especially with recent evidence suggesting that patients with AS associated with signs of myocardial...
KODRA Registry: Distal Radial Access as First Choice in Coronary Procedures
The first experiences with distal radial access (DRA) have revealed significant benefits compared against the transradial approach (TRA), showing reduced bleeding events and better puncture site occlusion rate. Even the spectrum of diseases treated with DRA has grown, and now includes chronic total occlusion (CTO) though 7Fr inductors, such as Terumo’s Glidesheath Slender. The aim...
Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Concomitant Transcatheter Intervention: Can We?
Several scientific societies support performing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as a stand-alone procedure, even though it is often associated to other cardiomyopathies requiring transcatheter intervention. Though still controversial, combining LAAO and any other cardiac intervention might reduce hospitalizations, as well as the need for additional punctures, anesthesia, red tape, a longer stay and higher...
Promising Results of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Bioprosthesis Failure
Failure of a mitral bioprosthesis always poses a challenge regarding decision-making, especially when dealing with elderly patients with multiple risk factors. The scenario is worsened by the high risk associated with a new sternotomy and the significant impact of undergoing new surgery. Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve (TMViV) replacement is emerging as a valid strategy in the...
Heterotopic Tricuspid Intervention: TricValve One-Year Outcomes
Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) presents a reserved prognosis when not treated in time, seeing as systemic venous congestion might significantly limit quality of life in these patients. For many years it was thought diuretic therapy was the only option to treat these patients, since the surgical alternative offered suboptimal results and many patients were deemed...
Is TAVR Beneficial in Cardiogenic Shock?
The presence of cardiogenic shock (CS) in a setting of aortic stenosis ranges from 1% to 4%. The prognosis for this scenario is ominous due to subendocardial ischemia, which presents as a decrease in ventricular preload and an increase in afterload. Aortic valvuloplasty has been used in this context, but, unfortunately, it has been associated...
TCT 2023 | CLASP IID Study 1-Year Results: PASCAL vs. MITRACLIP for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation
The negative impact of mitral regurgitation (MR) on patient mortality, morbidity, and quality of life is widely recognized. However, only 15% of patients are referred for surgery due to their high surgical risk and low ejection fraction. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair has become an important alternative for this group of patients. For subjects with degenerative MR,...
TAVR in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients: 30-Day Results
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended for symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), while close monitoring is the advised strategy for asymptomatic patients, unless they have elevated aortic gradients, reduced ejection fraction, or abnormal stress tests. However, the optimal timing for AVR remains uncertain, especially in light of recent evidence suggesting that AS patients showing signs of...