Degenerative aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valve condition. A significant number of AS patients presents a small aortic annulus (SAA), especially women. Treating this group of patients remains challenging, seeing as they have a high incidence of suboptimal hemodynamic results. Despite the development of TAVR (transcatheter aortic valve replacement), the current guidelines do<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2023/10/31/tct-2023-viva-trial-tavr-vs-savr-in-patients-with-severe-aortic-stenosis-and-small-aortic-annulus/" title="Read more" >...</a>
TCT 2023 | The WATCH-TAVR Study
In the TVT registry, around 40% of the patients eligible for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) had atrial fibrillation, and there were high levels of adverse events after starting anticoagulant treatment, especially with oral anticoagulants (VKAs), primarily due to bleeding. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of combined<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2023/10/27/tct-2023-the-watch-tavr-study/" title="Read more" >...</a>
OBSERVANT II: Post TAVR 30-Day and 6-Month Stroke Predictors
Despite stroke rate has declined since the early days of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), it remains significant, reaching 1% to 3% 30 days after procedure. Since TAVR has seen a progressive expansion to the low risk and young populations, identifying risk factors in patient selection and management is crucial for us to prevent stroke. <a href="https://solaci.org/en/2023/10/20/observant-ii-post-tavr-30-day-and-6-month-stroke-predictors/" title="Read more" >...</a>
Cause of Cardiac Death after TAVR at Present
Cardiac failure (CF) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) stand out as two of the main causes of death in patients with aortic stenosis. Although transcatheter aortic valve intervention has shown higher survival, these two continue to be the main conditions leading to patient death at followup. In its early days, TAVR also showed benefits, but<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2023/10/11/cause-of-cardiac-death-after-tavr-at-present/" title="Read more" >...</a>
TAVR in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients: 30-Day Results
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended for symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), while close monitoring is the advised strategy for asymptomatic patients, unless they have elevated aortic gradients, reduced ejection fraction, or abnormal stress tests. However, the optimal timing for AVR remains uncertain, especially in light of recent evidence suggesting that AS patients showing signs of<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2023/10/06/tavr-in-asymptomatic-or-minimally-symptomatic-patients-30-day-results/" title="Read more" >...</a>
Predictors and Evolution of Need for PPM after TAVR with Self-Expanding Valves
In the context of TAVR, one of the current challenges is the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM), especially when using self-expanding valves (SEV). The information available in this regard remains controversial; while some studies suggest new PPM implantation will have no significant effect on clinical evolution, others have associated them with worse prognosis. As<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2023/09/06/predictors-and-evolution-of-need-for-ppm-after-tavr-with-self-expanding-valves/" title="Read more" >...</a>
Predictors and Evolution of Permanent Pacemaker After TAVR with Self-Expanding Valves
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has shown remarkable benefits and continues to advance towards lower-risk patients and younger ages. However, one of its limitations lies in the demand for a permanent pacemaker (PPM), which during TAVR early stages with self-expanding valves reached 30%. Uncertainty persists regarding the evolution of patients undergoing PPM implantation after TAVR,<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2023/08/17/predictors-and-evolution-of-permanent-pacemaker-after-tavr-with-self-expanding-valves/" title="Read more" >...</a>
SOLACI-SBHCI 2023 | TAVR – Lifetime Management of Patients with Aortic Stenosis – Dr. Ole de Backer
Read the most outstanding articles from SOLACI-SBHCI 2023 Congress. In this case, check the presentation by Dr. Ole de Backer, entitled “TAVR – Lifetime Management of Patients with Aortic Stenosis”
TAVR Durability at 5 Years in Intermediate Risk Patients
TAVR has been shown beneficial in patients across the risk spectrum. The PARTNER 2 SAPIEN 3 (P2S3i) study on intermediate risk patients was the first to show TAVR superiority vs SAVR when using the transfemoral approach. SAVR durability has been shown in different analysis but, except for a few reports, TAVR durability at long term<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2023/07/11/tavr-durability-at-5-years-in-intermediate-risk-patients/" title="Read more" >...</a>
Aortic Stenosis and Cardiogenic Shock: Is TAVR an Option?
Cardiogenic shock (CS) in a setting of aortic stenosis is associated with high mortality rates. In consequence, surgery is generally not a possibility for this patient group, and they usually undergo aortic valvuloplasty, resulting in a mortality rate of 33%-50% at 30 days, 70% at one year, and 90% at two years. While transcatheter aortic<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2023/07/04/aortic-stenosis-and-cardiogenic-shock-is-tavr-an-option/" title="Read more" >...</a>