The predecessor of this research—RIPCORD, published in 2014—showed that using fractional flow reserve (FFR) changes the treatment strategy in about 25% of patients. That marked the rise of FFR. In fact, the DEFER, FAME, and FAME 2 studies offered results consistent with the original RIPCORD. In this research, authors tested the hypothesis of systematic use of...
Impact of FFR After Stenting: Useful or Mere Fun Fact?
Suboptimal fractional flow reserve (FFR) results after stenting only have a moderate impact on clinical hard points but might predict a much higher risk of reintervention. FFR has shown a huge impact on the decision-making process when it comes to revascularizing (or not) a lesion. Its impact after angioplasty has not been fully studied, particularly...
FREEDOM with FFR: Different Outcomes?
The FREEDOM has clearly established the benefit of myocardial revascularization surgery (CABG) over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients with multivessel disease. Coronary physiology as guideline for revascularization works best precisely in this kind of patients and its impact has never been studied in diabetics. This study, published in Circ Cardiovasc Interv, assessed the...
Global FFR as Prognosis in CAD Patients without Ischemia
Global fractional flow reserve (FFR) results from adding up FFR values of the three major coronary arteries. This figure represents the physiological atherosclerosis burden and can predict events at long term in patients without stenosis leading to ischemia. This recent study published in JAHA looked at major cardiovascular events (death, infarction and revascularization) at 5...
Watch Again New Frontiers in the Cath Lab
Watch again our Webinar “New frontiers in the Cath Lab” on our Youtube account. The event was held on 28/11/2020 and it was carried out by the Nurses and Technicians area. What things will I learn if I watch this video? 07:58 | Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR). Nursing Know How – Erika Hernández Álvarez...
AHA 2020 | The More Operators “Listen” to FFR, the Lower the Risk
When operators decide to proceed with PCI despite a negative FFR (fairly frequent in the daily practice) outcomes at 5 years are far worse. This information comes from a large Canadian register presented at AHA 2020 Scientific Sessions, simultaneously published in JAMA. PCI to a non-ischemic lesion results in increased events risk at long term,...
FFR and iFR Discordance in up to 20% of Cases: Which One Should Inform Our Decisions?
Invasive functional measurement of intermediate lesions has become the gold standard to define revascularization. Due to its favorable long-term prognostic value, fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the reference used to compare all others. Recently, new nonhyperemic indexes, measured in a specific diastolic period, have emerged. Among them, the one with the most accumulated evidence is...
TCT 2020 | Using OCT to Detect Vulnerable Plaque even with Negative FFR
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has proven useful in diabetic patients, even those with negative FFR. These findings make us rethink the ischemia and functional revascularization paradigm vs. the anatomical findings of vulnerable plaque. Diabetic patients with lesions that might be deferred base don FFR might benefit from OCT to find in these plaques certain risk...
The Most Read Scientific Articles of July in Interventional Cardiology
01- SOLACI PERIPHERAL | 2nd Clinical Case: Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm SOLACI’s Department of Peripheral Endovascular Interventions brings a new challenging clinical case for the whole Latin American medical community so as to continue fostering and sharing scientific knowledge and experience among peers. Read more HERE 02- EuroPCR 2020 | A Trick to Find the Perfect...
EuroPCR 2020 | Deferral Based on iFR vs. FFR: Are They Equivalent or Is There a New “Gold Standard”?
Age may impact results when making an angioplasty choice based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) vs. instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). After 2 years of follow-up, patients whose treatment of intermediate lesions was deferred based on functional testing had similar outcomes regardless of whether this decision was informed by FFR or iFR. However, iFR performance was constant,...