stent

Resultados a 2 años de los stents liberadores de Zotarolimus vs stents libres de polímero liberadores de Biolimus. ¿Son seguros en pacientes con alto riesgo de sangrado?

Longitudinal Deformation of a Stent with the POT Technique

The fractal geometry of coronary bifurcations offers a mismatch between the proximal diameter of the main branch and the distal branches that make up the bifurcation. Angioplasty in this area can be performed through different techniques depending on plaque distribution, and the particular geometry of each bifurcation. Overall, and regardless of the strategy used, there...

stent-liberador-drogas-sirolimus-everolimus

Thin vs. Ultrathin Stents: 1-Year Clinical Results After IVUS/OCT-Guided Implantation

Second generation drug-eluting stents have lower frequency of thrombotic complications and in-stent restenosis. While clinical results have significantly improved, having a 2-3% annual rate of these complications within the first year after angioplasty is still worrisome. This resulted in the development of stents with struts <70 µm (ultrathin), with bioresorbable polymer and abluminal cover. Stents...

Resultado a 3 años luego de ATC con técnica de 2- stents vs Provisional stent por bifurcaciones complejas

Three-Year Outcomes after CTA with 2-Stent Technique Vs. Provisional Stenting for Complex Bifurcation Lesions

The prevalence of coronary lesions with bifurcation involvement is about 20% in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CTA). While provisional stenting is overall the most accepted technique, the 2018 myocardial revascularization guidelines recommend the 2-stent technique for complex bifurcation lesions, defined as side branch with lesion >5mm, distal reference diameter of the side branch ≥2.75, or...

ELUVIA: DES en territorio femoropoplíteo con lesiones complejas

Two Safe Stents at Two Years in High Bleeding Risk

There is a consistent number of patients presenting high risk of bleeding. In this context, receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months would not be advisable. Even though the European and American guidelines recommend 1 to 6 months for chronic and acute syndromes in this group, these are often complex PCI cases, which makes...

Resultados a 2 años de los stents liberadores de Zotarolimus vs stents libres de polímero liberadores de Biolimus. ¿Son seguros en pacientes con alto riesgo de sangrado?

Results of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents vs Biolimus-Eluting Polymer-Free Stents After 2 Years. Are They Safe in Patients at High Risk for Bleeding?

The proportion of patients treated with coronary angioplasty who are at a high risk for bleeding is increasing. In this population, extended dual antithrombotic therapy increases the risk of bleeding. The 1-year randomized Onyx one study has demonstrated the non-inferiority of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) vs. biolimus-coated polymer-free stent BioFreedom (DCS). Patients received dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)...

Abbott Vascular suspendió la venta de Absorb en todos los países

Should We Start Thinking Again About Bioresorbable Stents?

Coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents (DES) is very frequent, especially in acute coronary syndromes, but these metallic stents are permanent foreign bodies that activate the entire inflammatory system. Using bioresorbable stents (BRS) emerged as an alternative to this challenge. Although the initial results of the ABSORB study were not as expected (probably due to a...

Resonancia vs FFR en lesiones no culpables del infarto

OCT in STEMI Patients: Is It Safe to Prevent Stenting?

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) where the physiopathological mechanism is plaque erosion or non-atherosclerotic mechanisms (such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection) is not beneficial according to recent studies.  The EROSION study (Effective Anti-Thrombotic Therapy Without Stenting: Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography–Based Management in Plaque Erosion) has shown medical treatment with no...

Dietas bajas en carbohidratos y progresión de la calcificación coronaria

CRUNCH Registry: An Option for Underexpanded Stents

Coronary calcification hinders both stent transfer and implantation, and has been associated with a higher risk of complications. Coronary perforation is the worst of them. In turn, these calcifications affect the preparation of coronary plaque, resulting in an underexpanded stent (US), which is a strong predictor of restenosis and early thrombosis. For the management of...

ELUVIA: DES en territorio femoropoplíteo con lesiones complejas

Should We Start Stenting with DES in Femoropopliteal Territory?

Percutaneous intervention of femoropopliteal lesions have been the standard strategy these past two decades. The development of drug eluting stents (DES) or drug eluting balloons (DEB) has improved patency rate compared against conventional balloon angioplasty. The ILLUMINA -a multicenter study- looked into the polymer free self-expanding stent NiTiDES, which showed at 1 year an 87%...

stent

STEMI: Can We Omit Stenting?

The recommended treatment for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) is early PCI, typically stenting. However, stent implantation always involves the risk of intravascular complications, such as stent thrombosis or restenosis.   Sometimes stable flow is restored to the target vessel after initial PCI and we can omit stenting when there is no angiographically significant residual...

Top