Vorapaxar in Acute Limb Ischemia

Original Title: Acute Limb Ischemia and Outcomes With Vorapaxar in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Results From TRA2°P-TIMI 50. Reference: Marc P. Bonaca et al. Circulation. 2016 Mar 8;133(10):997-1005.

 

Patients with peripheral artery disease have a high risk of acute limb ischemia, an event that may result in the loss of the affected limb.

This study addresses the causes, sequelae and predictors of acute limb ischemia and test the hypothesis that PAR-1 antagonism with vorapaxar reduce its incidence.

The TRA2°P-TIMI 50 was a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial that tested Vorapaxar in stable patients, including 3787 with a history of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Acute limb ischemia was pre-specified in the study.

A total of 150 acute limb ischemia events in 108 patients occurred during follow up(3.9% to 3 years, 1.3% annualized).

In patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease, smoking, prior revascularization and ankle-brachial index were predictors of acute limb ischemia.

Most of the acute ischemia events were due to femoropopliteal surgical graft thrombosis (56%), followed by native vessel in situ thrombosis (27%).

Stent thrombosis and thromboembolism caused acute limb ischemia in 13% and 5% respectively. Amputation occurred in 17.6% of acute limb ischemia patients. Vorapaxar reduced the chance of acute ischemia by 41% (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.86; p=0.006) and this efficacy was consistent across acute ischemia etiology.

Conclusion
In selected patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease with no atrial fibrillation, the rate of acute limb ischemia is 1.3% per year and is more often caused by acute thrombosis of a surgical bypass graft and in situ thrombosis. Vorapaxar reduces acute limb ischemia across all etiologies.

More articles by this author

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: When Should They Be Used?

Peripheral drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of peripheral arterial disease by reducing restenosis rates and the need for repeat interventions. However, the emergence...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Hemodynamic Outcomes of Edge-to-Edge Repair in Degenerative and Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) has become an established therapeutic option for mitral valve disease. Among the available techniques, M-TEER using the MitraClip...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...