xience

stents liberadores de farmacos

Xience V: Safe in “Real-Life” Bifurcation Lesions

Courtesy of Dr. Rodrigo Abreu.   INTRODUCTION Bifurcation lesion treatment has evolved considerably in the last years: from balloon angioplasty (with high occlusion and restenosis rates) to bare metal stent angioplasty (with a procedural success around 86% and major adverse cardiac events [MACE] at 1 year around 32%). The subsequent emergence of drug-eluting stents (DES) reduced...

NEXT trial demonstra não-inferioridade entre os stents com polímero biodegradável (Nobori®) comparados a stents com polímero durável (Xience V® / Promus®) no seguimento de 3 anos

Fundamentos: Dados recentes de metanálise tem levantado dúvidas com relação a segurança dos stents eluidores de fármacos com polímero biodegradável (BP-DES) quando comparados aos stents eluidores de fármacos com polímero durável (DP-EES).  O NOBORI® Biolimus-Eluting Stent (BP-BES) versus XIENCE® / PROMUS® (DP-DES) Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial (NEXT Trial) é um estudo randomizado de 98 centros, realizado...

ABSORB 2: Results at one year of bioabsorbable platform versus Xience

This randomized, controlled, multicenter and blind study compared the second generation of bio-absorbable stent platform with the everolimus-eluting Xience. 501 patients were randomized 2: 1 (Absorb / Xience) with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries with a reference diameter between 2.25 and 3.8 mm estimated by quantitative angiography. All the patients underwent IVUS and...

NEXT Trial: Biodegradable polymer stent (Nobori) was similar to the permanent polymer stents (Xience / Promus) at 2 years.

This multicenter work from Japanrandomized 3200 patients to receive biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stent(Nobori) or everolimus-eluting stent with permanent polymer (Xience / Promus). The primary end point for efficacy was any revascularizationlesion. A two year follow up the Nobori stent was non-inferior to death or myocardial infarction (7.83% versus 7.69%) and TLR (6.23% versus 5.95%). ...

CIBELES: Xience V comparative study vs Cypher for the treatment of total chronic occlusions.

Spanish-Portuguese multicentre CIBELES study (Raul Moreno, Madrid, Spain) compared two drug-eluting stents – an everolimus (Xience V, Abbott Vascular, USA) and a sirolimus-releasing eluting stent (Cypher Select, Cordis Corporation, Miami Lakes, Florida, USA) in the context of total chronic coronary occlusions. With a non-inferiority design, the study randomized 208 patients (1:1), using as the primary...

Balancear el riesgo de sangrado vs trombótico para definir el tiempo de doble antiagregación

Clopidogrel Monotherapy Beyond 12 months: Long Term Analysis of the STOPDAPT-2

Short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has shown benefits in patients receiving drug eluting stents (DES), reducing bleeding with no concomitant increase in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Traditionally, the therapeutic window was limited to monotherapy with P2Y12 inhibitors during the first year and there are few data on short DAPT followed by long term monotherapy...

Resonancia vs FFR en lesiones no culpables del infarto

OCT-Guided PCTA: Does It Offer any Benefits?

For many years, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PCTA) has expanded significantly worldwide. However, despite the demonstrated advantages of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in terms of minimal luminal area, reduced cardiovascular events, and restenosis, its use is not very common due to various reasons. On the other hand, optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers even higher resolution than...

Top