Stent

BIOSCIENCE study: Absorbable polymer versus permanent in sirolimus-eluting stents

This multicenter study randomized 1063 patients to receive the sirolimus-eluting stent with absorbable polymer and 1056 patients to permanent polymer stent. No differences in stent thrombosis (3.4% in the group with permanent polymer versus 2.8% in the group with absorbable polymer), target vessel revascularization (6.7% for both) or mortality (2.1% versus 2.9%; p = 0.7)....

EVERBIO II: Bio-absorbable stent Absorb versus everolimus-eluting or biolimus stents

The new generation drug-eluting everolimus or biolimus stents have proved superior to the first generation. However, neo intimal proliferation and late thrombosis remains a problem not yet solved same for all drug-eluting stents. The Absorb (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, IL, USA) is the first absorbable vascular support approved for clinical use. The EVERBIO II study...

OPTIMIZE: 3 months versus 12 months of dual anti-aggregation with zotarolimus-eluting stents

The current recommendation for dual anti-aggregation post-DES implantation is 12 months. However, the ideal length for specific types of stents is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical non-inferiority at 3 months versus 12 months of dual anti-platelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty with zotarolimus-eluting stents. The study randomized 1:1 to 3 months...

I-LOVE-IT2: Drug-eluting stents with a permanent polymer versus biodegradable in the same cobalt chromium platform

There is no strong evidence in the literature that the polymer type isolated (permanent or degradable) influences clinical outcomes after angioplasty and if the time of double anti-aggregation should be different with the degradable polymer. This work, with non-inferiority design, aimed to compare the sirolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer stent (Tivoli) versus the permanent polymer sirolimus-eluting stent...

Top