TCT 2017 | PREVAIL: Final Outcomes of the Watchman Device

Courtesy of SBHCI.

The final 5-year outcomes of the PROTECT AF and PREVAIL studies (which assessed the left atrial appendage closure device Watchman) continues to show similar stroke prevention rate to that of warfarin, though with a clear reduction in bleeding.

TCT 2017 | Resultados finales del dispositivo Watchman

The meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in hemorrhagic stroke (0.17% vs 0.87%), non-procedure related major bleeding (1.7% vs 3.6%), disabling or fatal stroke (0.37% vs 0.94%), cardiovascular death (1.3% vs 2.2%) and all-cause death (3.6% vs 4.9%). All these differences were significant.


Read also: TCT 2017 | The TRI-REPAIR and the FORMA Trials: New Devices for the “Forgotten Valve”.


As previously seen, ischemic stroke and systemic embolism rates were numerically higher with the Watchman device, though not significantly (1.6% vs 0.95%; p=0.08).

 

The 5-year outcomes of these two randomized studies show that left atrial appendage closure with this device prevents stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation similarly to anticoagulation, in addition to minimizing major bleeding, particularly hemorrhagic stroke.


Read also: TCT 2017 | SENIOR: DES with a Bioresorbable Polymer and Short Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Elderly Patients”.


This work, presented at TCT 2017 by Dr. Saibal Kar, was simultaneously published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

 

Courtesy of SBHCI.

 

Original title: 5-year outcomes after left atrial appendage closure: from the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF trials.

Presenter: Kar S.

 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Hemodynamic Outcomes of Edge-to-Edge Repair in Degenerative and Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) has become an established therapeutic option for mitral valve disease. Among the available techniques, M-TEER using the MitraClip...

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...